Your Toyota companion for all ownership needs
Guide

Bmw G 310 Gs Vs Ninja 300

What To Know

  • The G 310 GS features a 300mm single disc in front and a 240mm single disc in the rear, while the Ninja 300 has a 290mm dual disc setup in front and a 220mm single disc in the rear.
  • Both the G 310 GS and Ninja 300 are suitable for beginners, but the Ninja 300 may be slightly easier to handle due to its lower weight and more forgiving suspension.
  • The BMW G 310 GS has a slight edge in fuel efficiency, with a fuel consumption of around 60 mpg compared to 55 mpg for the Ninja 300.

When it comes to entry-level adventure motorcycles, the BMW G 310 GS and Kawasaki Ninja 300 stand out as two formidable contenders. Both bikes offer a blend of performance, versatility, and affordability, making them ideal for riders seeking a balance of on-road agility and off-road capability. In this comprehensive comparison, we delve into the key differences between these two exceptional motorcycles to help you make an informed decision.

Engine and Performance

The BMW G 310 GS is powered by a liquid-cooled, single-cylinder engine with a displacement of 313cc. It produces 34 horsepower and 21 lb-ft of torque, providing ample power for both urban commuting and highway cruising. The Kawasaki Ninja 300, on the other hand, features a liquid-cooled, parallel-twin engine with a displacement of 296cc. It generates 39 horsepower and 19 lb-ft of torque, offering a slightly higher performance edge.

Handling and Suspension

The G 310 GS excels in off-road terrain thanks to its long-travel suspension and upright riding position. Its 41mm USD fork and rear monoshock provide 7.5 inches of travel, allowing it to absorb bumps and maintain stability over rough surfaces. The Ninja 300, with its sportier suspension setup, is more suited for on-road riding. Its 37mm telescopic fork and rear monoshock offer 4.7 inches of travel, providing a more agile and responsive handling experience.

Braking and Safety Features

Both the G 310 GS and Ninja 300 come equipped with disc brakes at both the front and rear. The G 310 GS features a 300mm single disc in front and a 240mm single disc in the rear, while the Ninja 300 has a 290mm dual disc setup in front and a 220mm single disc in the rear. Both bikes offer ABS as standard, providing enhanced braking control in all conditions.

Design and Aesthetics

The BMW G 310 GS exudes a rugged and adventure-ready aesthetic with its tall stance, beak-like front fender, and protective handguards. The Kawasaki Ninja 300, in contrast, boasts a sleek and sporty design with its sharp lines, aerodynamic fairing, and exposed radiator.

Versatility and Practicality

The G 310 GS shines in versatility with its ability to tackle both on-road and off-road adventures. Its luggage rack and optional panniers provide ample storage space for extended trips. The Ninja 300 is primarily designed for on-road riding and offers limited practicality for extended touring.

Pricing and Availability

The BMW G 310 GS is priced slightly higher than the Kawasaki Ninja 300, with a starting price of around $5,000 compared to $4,500. Both bikes are widely available at dealerships across the globe.

Recommendations: The Choice is Yours

Ultimately, the choice between the BMW G 310 GS and Kawasaki Ninja 300 depends on your riding style and preferences. If you prioritize off-road capability, versatility, and ruggedness, the G 310 GS is an excellent option. However, if you prefer a more sporty, agile, and affordable machine for primarily on-road riding, the Ninja 300 is a strong contender.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Which bike has a higher top speed?

A: The Kawasaki Ninja 300 has a slightly higher top speed than the BMW G 310 GS, with a top speed of around 112 mph compared to 105 mph.

Q: Which bike is best for beginners?

A: Both the G 310 GS and Ninja 300 are suitable for beginners, but the Ninja 300 may be slightly easier to handle due to its lower weight and more forgiving suspension.

Q: Which bike is more fuel-efficient?

A: The BMW G 310 GS has a slight edge in fuel efficiency, with a fuel consumption of around 60 mpg compared to 55 mpg for the Ninja 300.

Was this page helpful?
Back to top button