Ford ranger engine showdown: which powerhouse dominates in 2023?
What To Know
- When it comes to choosing a pickup truck, the Ford Ranger is a popular option for its versatility and capabilities.
- 0-liter engine is rated for an EPA-estimated 22 mpg in the city and 30 mpg on the highway, while the 3.
- 0-liter, on the other hand, has a maximum towing capacity of 5,000 pounds and a payload capacity of up to 1,680 pounds.
When it comes to choosing a pickup truck, the Ford Ranger is a popular option for its versatility and capabilities. However, deciding between the 3.2-liter and 2.0-liter engines can be a daunting task. This blog post will provide an in-depth comparison of the Ford Ranger 3.2 engine vs. 2.0 engine to help you make an informed decision.
Power and Torque
The Ford Ranger 3.2-liter engine is a five-cylinder, turbocharged diesel engine that produces 200 horsepower and 347 lb-ft of torque. On the other hand, the Ranger 2.0-liter engine is a four-cylinder, turbocharged diesel engine that generates 180 horsepower and 310 lb-ft of torque. While both engines offer ample power for towing and hauling, the 3.2-liter engine has a slight advantage in terms of raw power and torque.
Fuel Efficiency
When it comes to fuel efficiency, the Ford Ranger 2.0-liter engine has a clear advantage over the 3.2-liter engine. The 2.0-liter engine is rated for an EPA-estimated 22 mpg in the city and 30 mpg on the highway, while the 3.2-liter engine is rated for 19 mpg in the city and 24 mpg on the highway. This difference in fuel economy is mainly due to the smaller displacement and lighter weight of the 2.0-liter engine.
Towing and Payload Capacity
If towing and payload capacity are your primary concerns, the Ford Ranger 3.2-liter engine is the clear winner. When properly equipped, the Ranger 3.2-liter can tow up to 7,500 pounds and carry a payload of up to 2,310 pounds. The Ranger 2.0-liter, on the other hand, has a maximum towing capacity of 5,000 pounds and a payload capacity of up to 1,680 pounds.
Off-Road Performance
For those who plan on using their Ford Ranger for off-road adventures, the 3.2-liter engine is the better choice. The additional power and torque of the 3.2-liter engine provide better low-end grunt for tackling rough terrain. Additionally, the 3.2-liter engine is paired with a standard 4×4 system, while the 2.0-liter engine is only available with optional 4×4.
Transmission Options
The Ford Ranger 3.2-liter engine comes with a standard six-speed automatic transmission. This transmission offers smooth shifting and a wide range of gear ratios for optimal performance in various driving conditions. The Ranger 2.0-liter engine, on the other hand, is available with either a six-speed manual or a six-speed automatic transmission. The manual transmission offers greater control and engagement, while the automatic transmission provides convenience and ease of use.
Price and Availability
In terms of price, the Ford Ranger 2.0-liter engine is typically less expensive than the 3.2-liter engine. However, the price difference varies depending on the trim level and options selected. The availability of the 3.2-liter engine is limited to higher trim levels, while the 2.0-liter engine is more widely available across the Ranger lineup.
Takeaways
The choice between the Ford Ranger 3.2 engine vs. 2.0 engine ultimately depends on your specific needs and priorities. If you require maximum power and torque for towing and hauling, the 3.2-liter engine is the better option. However, if fuel efficiency, lower price, and off-road performance are more important to you, the 2.0-liter engine is a solid choice.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: Which engine is better for fuel efficiency?
A: The Ford Ranger 2.0-liter engine has better fuel efficiency than the 3.2-liter engine.
Q: Which engine has more power and torque?
A: The Ford Ranger 3.2-liter engine has more power and torque than the 2.0-liter engine.
Q: Which engine is better for off-roading?
A: The Ford Ranger 3.2-liter engine is better for off-roading due to its additional power and torque.
Q: Which engine is more expensive?
A: The Ford Ranger 3.2-liter engine is typically more expensive than the 2.0-liter engine.
Q: Which engine is more widely available?
A: The Ford Ranger 2.0-liter engine is more widely available across the Ranger lineup.