Terrain or cx-50? comparing two top-rated compact suvs in 2023
What To Know
- Both the GMC Terrain and the Mazda CX-50 have earned top safety ratings from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) and the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS).
- The Terrain received a five-star overall safety rating from the NHTSA, while the CX-50 earned a Top Safety Pick+ designation from the IIHS.
- However, the CX-50 comes with a more generous list of standard features than the Terrain, making it a better value for the money.
The compact SUV market is a fiercely competitive one, with automakers vying for a slice of the pie. Two standout contenders in this segment are the GMC Terrain and the Mazda CX-50. Both vehicles offer a compelling blend of style, performance, and value, but which one is the better choice for you? In this comprehensive comparison, we’ll pit the GMC Terrain against the Mazda CX-50 and delve into their key features, specifications, and strengths to help you make an informed decision.
Exterior: Rugged vs Refined
The GMC Terrain exudes a rugged and muscular presence, with its bold grille, chiseled body lines, and optional off-road tires. In contrast, the Mazda CX-50 presents a more refined and sleek exterior, characterized by its flowing curves, sharp angles, and elegant chrome accents. While the Terrain’s design is more suited for adventurous spirits, the CX-50’s aesthetic appeals to those who value sophistication.
Interior: Spacious vs Sporty
Inside, the GMC Terrain offers a spacious and comfortable cabin with plenty of headroom and legroom. The materials and fit and finish are of high quality, creating a premium atmosphere. The Mazda CX-50, on the other hand, features a more driver-centric interior with a sporty cockpit design. The seats are supportive and provide excellent visibility, although the rear seat may feel a bit cramped for taller passengers.
Features: Tech-Savvy vs Adventurous
When it comes to technology, the GMC Terrain and Mazda CX-50 are both well-equipped. The Terrain boasts a user-friendly infotainment system with Apple CarPlay and Android Auto integration, as well as a host of safety features such as lane departure warning and automatic emergency braking. The CX-50, however, takes technology to the next level with its advanced i-Activsense safety suite, which includes adaptive cruise control, blind spot monitoring, and rear cross-traffic alert.
Performance: Power vs Fuel Efficiency
Under the hood, the GMC Terrain offers a choice of two engines: a 1.5-liter turbocharged four-cylinder and a 2.0-liter turbocharged four-cylinder. The base engine provides adequate power for daily driving, while the upgraded engine delivers impressive performance for highway cruising and towing. The Mazda CX-50, on the other hand, comes with a single 2.5-liter naturally aspirated four-cylinder engine that prioritizes fuel efficiency over raw power.
Handling: Off-Road vs On-Road
The GMC Terrain is available with an optional all-wheel drive system with an off-road mode, giving it the ability to tackle rough terrain with confidence. The CX-50, while not as off-road capable as the Terrain, still offers all-wheel drive for enhanced traction in inclement weather. Both vehicles provide a comfortable and composed ride on paved roads, but the Terrain’s off-road capabilities give it an edge for those who venture beyond the beaten path.
Safety: Top-Rated vs Five-Star
Both the GMC Terrain and the Mazda CX-50 have earned top safety ratings from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) and the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS). The Terrain received a five-star overall safety rating from the NHTSA, while the CX-50 earned a Top Safety Pick+ designation from the IIHS. Both vehicles come standard with a comprehensive suite of safety features, ensuring peace of mind for drivers and passengers alike.
Pricing: Value vs Luxury
The GMC Terrain has a starting price of $27,800, while the Mazda CX-50 starts at $27,500. However, the CX-50 comes with a more generous list of standard features than the Terrain, making it a better value for the money. As you move up the trim levels, the price gap widens, with the top-of-the-line Terrain Denali costing significantly more than the fully loaded CX-50 Turbo Premium Plus.
The Verdict: A Tale of Two SUVs
Ultimately, the choice between the GMC Terrain and the Mazda CX-50 depends on your individual needs and preferences. If you prioritize ruggedness, off-road capability, and a spacious interior, the GMC Terrain is the better choice. However, if you value fuel efficiency, a more refined interior, and advanced technology, the Mazda CX-50 is the clear winner. Both vehicles are excellent choices in their own right, and the best way to decide which one is right for you is to take them both for a test drive.
What You Need to Know
Q: Which SUV has the more powerful engine?
A: The GMC Terrain offers a more powerful engine option than the Mazda CX-50.
Q: Which SUV has better off-road capabilities?
A: The GMC Terrain has optional all-wheel drive with an off-road mode, making it more capable in rough terrain than the Mazda CX-50.
Q: Which SUV has a more spacious interior?
A: The GMC Terrain has a more spacious interior than the Mazda CX-50, offering more headroom and legroom for passengers.
Q: Which SUV has a better fuel economy?
A: The Mazda CX-50 has a better fuel economy than the GMC Terrain, thanks to its naturally aspirated engine.
Q: Which SUV is safer?
A: Both the GMC Terrain and the Mazda CX-50 have earned top safety ratings from the NHTSA and the IIHS.
