Cr-v vs cx-50: which is the better value suv?
What To Know
- However, the CX-50 has a slight edge in fuel economy, with an EPA-estimated 25 mpg in the city and 30 mpg on the highway compared to the CR-V’s 25 mpg in the city and 29 mpg on the highway.
- The CR-V offers a more spacious and comfortable interior, while the CX-50 offers better fuel economy, a more responsive steering system, and a more capable off-road system.
- The CX-50 has better fuel economy, with an EPA-estimated 25 mpg in the city and 30 mpg on the highway compared to the CR-V’s 25 mpg in the city and 29 mpg on the highway.
The Honda CR-V and the Mazda CX-50 are two of the most popular compact SUVs on the market. Both offer a combination of style, performance, and practicality that appeals to a wide range of buyers. But which one is the better choice for you? In this comprehensive comparison, we’ll pit the Honda CR-V against the CX-50 to see which SUV comes out on top.
Performance and Fuel Economy
The CR-V and CX-50 offer similar performance, with both vehicles powered by 2.5-liter four-cylinder engines that produce around 180 horsepower and 180 lb-ft of torque. However, the CX-50 has a slight edge in fuel economy, with an EPA-estimated 25 mpg in the city and 30 mpg on the highway compared to the CR-V’s 25 mpg in the city and 29 mpg on the highway.
Interior Comfort and Features
Both the CR-V and CX-50 offer spacious and comfortable interiors. The CR-V has a more traditional SUV-like interior, with a high seating position and plenty of headroom and legroom. The CX-50, on the other hand, has a more car-like interior, with a lower seating position and a more driver-focused design.
In terms of features, both vehicles come standard with a range of features, including a touchscreen infotainment system, Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, and a suite of safety features. The CR-V has a slight edge in terms of cargo space, with 39.2 cubic feet of space behind the second row of seats compared to the CX-50’s 31.4 cubic feet.
Driving Dynamics
The CR-V and CX-50 both offer a comfortable and composed ride. The CR-V has a softer suspension that absorbs bumps better, while the CX-50 has a firmer suspension that provides better handling. The CX-50 also has a more responsive steering system that makes it more fun to drive on winding roads.
Off-Road Capability
The CR-V and CX-50 both offer all-wheel drive, but the CX-50 has a more capable off-road system. The CX-50 comes standard with a locking rear differential and hill descent control, while the CR-V does not. The CX-50 also has a higher ground clearance than the CR-V, which gives it an advantage when driving on rough terrain.
Safety
Both the CR-V and CX-50 have received top safety ratings from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) and the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS). The CR-V comes standard with a suite of safety features, including automatic emergency braking, lane departure warning, and adaptive cruise control. The CX-50 offers a similar range of safety features, but it also comes standard with blind spot monitoring and rear cross-traffic alert.
Price and Value
The CR-V and CX-50 are priced similarly, with the CR-V starting at $27,150 and the CX-50 starting at $27,800. However, the CX-50 offers a more comprehensive range of features and a more capable off-road system, making it a better value for the money.
The Verdict
The Honda CR-V and Mazda CX-50 are both excellent compact SUVs. The CR-V offers a more spacious and comfortable interior, while the CX-50 offers better fuel economy, a more responsive steering system, and a more capable off-road system. Ultimately, the best choice for you will depend on your individual needs and preferences.
Alternatives to Consider
If you’re looking for a compact SUV that offers similar performance and features to the CR-V and CX-50, you may want to consider the following alternatives:
- Toyota RAV4
- Subaru Forester
- Nissan Rogue
- Hyundai Tucson
- Kia Sportage
What People Want to Know
Q: Which SUV has better fuel economy, the CR-V or CX-50?
A: The CX-50 has better fuel economy, with an EPA-estimated 25 mpg in the city and 30 mpg on the highway compared to the CR-V’s 25 mpg in the city and 29 mpg on the highway.
Q: Which SUV has more cargo space, the CR-V or CX-50?
A: The CR-V has more cargo space, with 39.2 cubic feet of space behind the second row of seats compared to the CX-50’s 31.4 cubic feet.
Q: Which SUV is better off-road, the CR-V or CX-50?
A: The CX-50 is better off-road thanks to its standard locking rear differential, hill descent control, and higher ground clearance.