Honda hornet 2.0 vs tvs apache 180: which motorcycle rules the road?

In the realm of Indian motorcycling, two titans clash for dominance: the Honda Hornet 2.0 and the Apache 180. Both machines boast impressive credentials, promising a thrilling ride experience. This comprehensive comparison will delve into the key aspects of these two formidable contenders, helping you make an informed decision on your next street-taming adventure.

Engine and Performance

The Hornet 2.0’s 184.9cc air-cooled engine produces a healthy 17.26 bhp at 8500 rpm and 16.1 Nm of torque at 6000 rpm. The Apache 180, on the other hand, features a smaller 177.4cc air-cooled engine that generates 17.36 bhp at 8500 rpm and 16.15 Nm of torque at 6500 rpm.

While the Apache 180 has a slight edge in horsepower and torque, the Hornet 2.0’s larger displacement and linear power delivery give it an advantage in overall performance. Its engine feels smoother and more refined, providing a more enjoyable riding experience.

Suspension and Handling

Both the Hornet 2.0 and Apache 180 feature telescopic front forks and monoshock rear suspension. However, the Hornet 2.0’s suspension is slightly more sophisticated, with adjustable preload at the rear. This allows for customization to suit different riding conditions and preferences.

In terms of handling, both bikes are agile and maneuverable, making them ideal for urban commuting and spirited weekend rides. However, the Hornet 2.0’s longer wheelbase provides slightly better stability at higher speeds.

Brakes and Safety

The Hornet 2.0 comes equipped with a 276mm front disc brake and a 220mm rear disc brake, while the Apache 180 has a 270mm front disc brake and a 130mm rear drum brake. The Hornet 2.0’s larger front disc brake offers better stopping power and feel.

In terms of safety features, the Hornet 2.0 has an edge over the Apache 180. It features a single-channel ABS system that prevents wheel lock-ups during sudden braking, providing added confidence and control.

Design and Features

The Hornet 2.0 exudes a sporty and aggressive stance, with sharp lines and a muscular fuel tank. The Apache 180, on the other hand, has a more understated and classic design.

In terms of features, the Hornet 2.0 comes with a fully digital instrument cluster, while the Apache 180 has a semi-digital instrument cluster. The Hornet 2.0 also has a USB charging port and an LED headlamp, which are not available on the Apache 180.

Price and Availability

The Honda Hornet 2.0 is priced slightly higher than the Apache 180, with an ex-showroom price of around INR 1.36 lakh compared to the Apache 180’s INR 1.25 lakh. Both bikes are readily available at Honda and TVS dealerships across India.

Which One Should You Choose?

The choice between the Honda Hornet 2.0 and the Apache 180 ultimately depends on your individual preferences and budget. If you prioritize performance, refinement, and safety, the Hornet 2.0 is the better option. However, if you are looking for a more affordable and feature-packed motorcycle, the Apache 180 may be a better fit.

Ultimate Verdict: The Honda Hornet 2.0 Wins the Crown

After a thorough comparison, the Honda Hornet 2.0 emerges as the victor. Its superior engine performance, sophisticated suspension, advanced braking system, and comprehensive feature set make it the more compelling choice for riders seeking a thrilling and well-rounded street motorcycle. While the Apache 180 is a worthy competitor, it falls short in key areas that ultimately determine the overall riding experience.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Which bike is more fuel-efficient?
A: Both the Hornet 2.0 and Apache 180 have similar fuel efficiency, with an average of around 45-50 kmpl in real-world conditions.

Q: Which bike has a better top speed?
A: The Hornet 2.0 has a slightly higher top speed than the Apache 180, with a claimed top speed of around 130 kmph compared to the Apache 180’s 125 kmph.

Q: Which bike is more suitable for long-distance riding?
A: The Hornet 2.0’s more comfortable ergonomics, longer wheelbase, and smoother engine make it a better choice for long-distance riding compared to the Apache 180.