Honda Hornet 2.0 Vs Apache Rtr 160 4v
What To Know
- In contrast, the Apache RTR 160 4V has a more traditional street fighter design, with a sleek headlight, a compact fuel tank, and a sharp tail.
- 0’s suspension setup, consisting of a telescopic front fork and a monoshock at the rear, offers a comfortable and composed ride quality.
- 0 offers a more muscular design, better braking, and a more comfortable ride quality, the RTR 160 4V provides better performance, higher fuel efficiency, and Bluetooth connectivity.
In the Indian motorcycle market, the Honda Hornet 2.0 and the Apache RTR 160 4V are two popular street fighters that offer a thrilling riding experience. Both motorcycles come with their unique strengths and weaknesses, making it crucial for potential buyers to understand their differences before making a decision. This comprehensive comparison aims to provide detailed insights into the key aspects of these two motorcycles, helping you make an informed choice.
Design and Styling
The Honda Hornet 2.0 boasts a muscular and aggressive design, featuring a sharp headlight, a sculpted fuel tank, and a sporty tail section. In contrast, the Apache RTR 160 4V has a more traditional street fighter design, with a sleek headlight, a compact fuel tank, and a sharp tail. Both motorcycles offer a comfortable riding position, but the Hornet 2.0’s wider handlebars and upright seating position may be more suitable for taller riders.
Engine and Performance
The Hornet 2.0 is powered by a 184.9cc, air-cooled, single-cylinder engine that produces 17.26 horsepower and 16.1 Nm of torque. The RTR 160 4V, on the other hand, is equipped with a 159.7cc, oil-cooled, single-cylinder engine that generates 17.63 horsepower and 14.8 Nm of torque. Despite having a slightly smaller displacement, the RTR 160 4V’s oil-cooling system helps it deliver smoother and more refined performance.
Features and Technology
The Hornet 2.0 comes with a fully digital instrument cluster, LED lighting, and a hazard switch. The RTR 160 4V also features a fully digital instrument cluster, but it additionally offers Bluetooth connectivity, allowing riders to access various features through the TVS Connect app. Both motorcycles come with single-channel ABS, but the Hornet 2.0’s front and rear disc brakes provide better stopping power.
Ride and Handling
The Hornet 2.0’s suspension setup, consisting of a telescopic front fork and a monoshock at the rear, offers a comfortable and composed ride quality. The RTR 160 4V’s suspension, on the other hand, is slightly stiffer, resulting in a sportier and more agile handling experience. Both motorcycles are equipped with wide tires, providing excellent grip and stability during cornering.
Fuel Efficiency and Mileage
The Hornet 2.0 delivers an average fuel efficiency of around 45-50 kmpl, while the RTR 160 4V offers a slightly better fuel efficiency of around 50-55 kmpl. The RTR 160 4V’s smaller fuel tank, however, limits its overall range compared to the Hornet 2.0.
Price and Value for Money
The Honda Hornet 2.0 is priced slightly higher than the Apache RTR 160 4V. While the Hornet 2.0 offers a more muscular design, better braking, and a more comfortable ride quality, the RTR 160 4V provides better performance, higher fuel efficiency, and Bluetooth connectivity. Ultimately, the choice between these two motorcycles depends on individual preferences and budget.
Verdict
Both the Honda Hornet 2.0 and the Apache RTR 160 4V are excellent street fighters that offer a thrilling riding experience. The Hornet 2.0 is a good choice for riders who prioritize comfort, style, and braking performance, while the RTR 160 4V is ideal for those who seek performance, fuel efficiency, and technology. By carefully considering the key differences between these two motorcycles, potential buyers can make an informed decision that best suits their needs and riding style.
Questions We Hear a Lot
Q1. Which motorcycle has a more powerful engine?
A1. The Apache RTR 160 4V has a slightly more powerful engine, generating 17.63 horsepower compared to the Hornet 2.0’s 17.26 horsepower.
Q2. Does the Hornet 2.0 offer Bluetooth connectivity?
A2. No, the Hornet 2.0 does not offer Bluetooth connectivity.
Q3. Which motorcycle has a larger fuel tank?
A3. The Hornet 2.0 has a larger fuel tank with a capacity of 12 liters compared to the RTR 160 4V’s 11-liter fuel tank.
Q4. Is the RTR 160 4V more fuel-efficient than the Hornet 2.0?
A4. Yes, the RTR 160 4V offers slightly better fuel efficiency, delivering around 50-55 kmpl compared to the Hornet 2.0’s 45-50 kmpl.
Q5. Which motorcycle is more comfortable for long rides?
A5. The Hornet 2.0 offers a more comfortable ride quality for long rides due to its wider handlebars and upright seating position.