Honda Hornet 2.0 Vs Pulsar 220f

The Honda Hornet 2.0 and Pulsar 220F are two of the most popular motorcycles in the Indian market, each catering to a specific segment of riders. While the Hornet 2.0 is a premium naked streetfighter, the Pulsar 220F is a performance-oriented faired motorcycle. In this comprehensive comparison, we will delve into the key aspects of these two motorcycles to help you make an informed decision.

Engine and Performance

The Honda Hornet 2.0 is powered by a 184.9cc, single-cylinder, air-cooled engine that produces 17.26 horsepower and 16.1 Nm of torque. The Pulsar 220F, on the other hand, boasts a 220cc, single-cylinder, oil-cooled DTS-i engine that generates 20.4 horsepower and 18.55 Nm of torque.

In terms of acceleration, the Pulsar 220F has a slight edge over the Hornet 2.0, reaching 0-60 km/h in 4.2 seconds compared to 4.5 seconds for the Hornet. However, the Hornet 2.0 makes up for it with its higher top speed of 130 km/h, while the Pulsar 220F is limited to 125 km/h.

Handling and Suspension

The Honda Hornet 2.0 features a diamond-type frame with a telescopic front fork and a mono-shock rear suspension. The Pulsar 220F utilizes a perimeter frame with a telescopic front fork and a Nitrox mono-shock rear suspension.

Both motorcycles offer good handling, but the Hornet 2.0 feels more agile and responsive in urban environments due to its lighter weight and narrower handlebars. The Pulsar 220F, on the other hand, provides a more stable and planted ride at higher speeds thanks to its larger tires and longer wheelbase.

Braking and Safety

The Honda Hornet 2.0 comes equipped with a single 276mm front disc brake and a 220mm rear disc brake with a single-channel ABS. The Pulsar 220F features a 260mm front disc brake and a 230mm rear disc brake with a dual-channel ABS.

Both motorcycles offer adequate braking performance, but the Pulsar 220F has a slight advantage due to its dual-channel ABS, which provides better stability and control during emergency braking.

Features and Technology

The Honda Hornet 2.0 boasts a digital instrument cluster with a gear position indicator, a trip meter, and a fuel gauge. The Pulsar 220F offers a semi-digital instrument cluster with an analog tachometer and a digital display for speed, mileage, and fuel level.

In terms of technology, the Hornet 2.0 features an optional Bluetooth connectivity system that allows riders to connect their smartphones and access features such as navigation and music control. The Pulsar 220F does not offer any advanced technology features.

Design and Styling

The Honda Hornet 2.0 has a modern and aggressive naked streetfighter design with sharp lines, a muscular fuel tank, and a compact LED headlamp. The Pulsar 220F sports a sporty faired design with a sharp front fairing, a stepped seat, and a sleek LED tail lamp.

Both motorcycles have their own distinct appeal, but the Hornet 2.0’s naked design and muscular stance give it a more premium and aggressive look.

Price and Availability

The Honda Hornet 2.0 is priced between INR 1.32 lakhs and INR 1.38 lakhs, while the Pulsar 220F costs between INR 1.18 lakhs and INR 1.25 lakhs (ex-showroom, Delhi).

Both motorcycles are widely available across India through authorized dealerships and showrooms.

Which One Should You Choose?

The Honda Hornet 2.0 and Pulsar 220F are both excellent motorcycles that cater to different needs and preferences. If you’re looking for a premium, agile, and modern streetfighter, the Hornet 2.0 is the better choice. However, if you prioritize performance, stability, and value for money, the Pulsar 220F is a more suitable option.

Conclusion: The Ultimate Street Dominator

Choosing between the Honda Hornet 2.0 and Pulsar 220F ultimately depends on your individual requirements and riding style. Both motorcycles offer their own unique strengths and appeal, and the decision should be based on your specific needs and preferences.

Information You Need to Know

1. Which motorcycle has a better fuel economy?

The Honda Hornet 2.0 has a better fuel economy compared to the Pulsar 220F, delivering an average of 45-50 km/l under normal riding conditions.

2. Which motorcycle is more comfortable for long rides?

The Pulsar 220F offers a more comfortable riding position with a wider seat and a more upright riding stance, making it better suited for long rides.

3. Which motorcycle has a better resale value?

The Honda Hornet 2.0 is expected to have a better resale value compared to the Pulsar 220F due to its premium brand image and higher demand in the used motorcycle market.