Affordable sportbike comparison: kawasaki ninja 300 vs ktm rc 390

The world of sportbikes is filled with an array of thrilling options, and two of the most popular choices for riders seeking a balance of power and agility are the Kawasaki Ninja 300 and the KTM RC 390. These machines offer a captivating blend of performance, handling, and aesthetics, making them ideal for both experienced and novice riders. In this comprehensive comparison, we delve into the key differences between these two exceptional sportbikes, providing an in-depth analysis of their specifications, performance, and riding experience.

Engine and Performance

The Kawasaki Ninja 300 boasts a liquid-cooled, parallel-twin engine with a displacement of 296cc. This engine produces a maximum power output of 39 horsepower at 11,000 rpm and a peak torque of 21 pound-feet at 10,000 rpm. The KTM RC 390, on the other hand, features a liquid-cooled, single-cylinder engine with a slightly larger displacement of 373cc. This engine generates a more impressive 44 horsepower at 9,500 rpm and 27 pound-feet of torque at 7,000 rpm.

Handling and Suspension

The Ninja 300 is renowned for its nimble handling and precise steering. Its lightweight chassis and suspension setup provide a responsive and agile ride, making it an ideal choice for navigating tight corners and urban environments. The RC 390 also excels in handling, with its stiffer suspension and aggressive riding position. Its advanced suspension system, featuring an upside-down fork and a monoshock, offers excellent stability and control during high-speed maneuvers.

Braking and Safety Features

Both the Ninja 300 and RC 390 come equipped with advanced braking systems. The Ninja 300 features dual 290mm petal-type front discs and a single 220mm rear disc, while the RC 390 boasts larger 320mm front discs and a 230mm rear disc. Both bikes offer ABS as standard, providing increased braking confidence and safety in various conditions.

Technology and Features

The Ninja 300 offers a range of modern features, including a digital instrument cluster, LED headlights, and a slipper clutch. The RC 390 takes technology a step further, featuring a full-color TFT display, adjustable ride modes, and cornering ABS. Additionally, the RC 390 benefits from a quick-shifter, allowing for seamless gear changes without the use of the clutch.

Aesthetics and Styling

The Ninja 300 and RC 390 both sport striking and aggressive designs. The Ninja 300’s sleek and aerodynamic bodywork exudes a sense of speed and agility, while the RC 390’s angular and race-inspired lines evoke a sense of performance and excitement. Both bikes come in a variety of vibrant color options, catering to different tastes and preferences.

Price and Value

The Kawasaki Ninja 300 typically retails for around $5,000, while the KTM RC 390 has a slightly higher price tag, starting at around $5,500. While the RC 390 offers a few more features and a slightly more powerful engine, the Ninja 300 provides exceptional value for its price, making it an attractive option for budget-conscious riders.

The Verdict: A Matter of Preference

Ultimately, the choice between the Kawasaki Ninja 300 and the KTM RC 390 boils down to personal preference and riding style. For riders seeking a nimble and economical sportbike with a proven track record, the Ninja 300 is an excellent choice. However, for those seeking a more powerful and feature-rich machine with an aggressive riding position, the RC 390 is the superior option.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Which bike has a lower seat height?
A: The Ninja 300 has a slightly lower seat height of 31.1 inches compared to the RC 390’s 32.3 inches.

Q: Does the RC 390 come with a slipper clutch?
A: No, the RC 390 does not come with a slipper clutch. This feature is only available on the Ninja 300.

Q: Which bike has a longer warranty?
A: Both the Ninja 300 and RC 390 come with a 12-month limited warranty.

Q: Is the RC 390 suitable for long-distance touring?
A: While the RC 390 is capable of long-distance touring, its aggressive riding position and limited fuel capacity may not be ideal for extended rides.

Q: Which bike is more fuel-efficient?
A: The Ninja 300 typically offers better fuel efficiency than the RC 390, with an average fuel consumption of around 50 mpg compared to the RC 390’s 40 mpg.