Your Toyota companion for all ownership needs
Guide

Kawasaki Ninja 400 Vs Cfmoto 450 Sr

What To Know

  • The 450SR, on the other hand, features a 43mm upside-down fork with adjustable rebound and preload, as well as a rear shock with adjustable preload and rebound.
  • The Ninja 400 utilizes a single 310mm front disc and a 220mm rear disc, while the 450SR employs dual 320mm front discs and a 260mm rear disc.
  • The Ninja 400 is a more affordable option, while the 450SR offers a higher level of performance and technology at a premium price.

In the realm of middleweight sportbikes, two formidable contenders stand out: the Kawasaki Ninja 400 and the CFMoto 450SR. Both machines offer a blend of performance, agility, and affordability, catering to riders seeking an exhilarating and accessible riding experience. However, each possesses unique strengths and characteristics that set them apart. In this comprehensive comparison, we delve into the details of the Kawasaki Ninja 400 vs CFMoto 450SR to help you make an informed decision.

Engine and Performance

At the heart of the Ninja 400 lies a parallel-twin engine displacing 399cc, producing 49 horsepower and 25 lb-ft of torque. The CFMoto 450SR, on the other hand, boasts a larger parallel-twin engine with a displacement of 450cc, generating 50 horsepower and 32 lb-ft of torque. While the 450SR offers slightly more power and torque, the Ninja 400’s lighter weight (366 lbs vs. 410 lbs) results in a comparable power-to-weight ratio.

Handling and Suspension

When it comes to handling, both the Ninja 400 and 450SR excel in agility and precision. The Ninja 400 features a trellis frame with a 54.1-inch wheelbase, providing a nimble and responsive ride. The 450SR, however, has a slightly longer wheelbase (55.1 inches) and a stiffer frame, offering greater stability at higher speeds.

In terms of suspension, the Ninja 400 comes equipped with a 41mm non-adjustable fork and a preload-adjustable rear shock. The 450SR, on the other hand, features a 43mm upside-down fork with adjustable rebound and preload, as well as a rear shock with adjustable preload and rebound. These upgrades give the 450SR an edge in terms of handling precision and ride comfort.

Brakes and Safety Features

Both the Ninja 400 and 450SR come standard with dual-channel ABS, ensuring optimal braking performance. The Ninja 400 utilizes a single 310mm front disc and a 220mm rear disc, while the 450SR employs dual 320mm front discs and a 260mm rear disc. The larger discs on the 450SR provide slightly more stopping power, but both bikes offer confident and responsive braking.

Styling and Ergonomics

The Kawasaki Ninja 400 exudes a sleek and aggressive design, with sharp lines and a low-slung stance. The CFMoto 450SR, on the other hand, adopts a more modern and aerodynamic appearance, featuring a full-fairing with integrated LED lighting.

In terms of ergonomics, the Ninja 400 offers a slightly more upright riding position, making it more comfortable for longer rides. The 450SR, however, has a more aggressive riding posture, designed for spirited riding.

Technology and Features

The Ninja 400 comes equipped with a semi-digital instrument cluster, providing essential information such as speed, RPM, and fuel level. The 450SR, on the other hand, boasts a fully digital TFT display, offering a wealth of information including gear position, lap times, and tire pressure monitoring.

Additionally, the 450SR features a smartphone connectivity system that allows riders to connect their phones to the bike and access features such as navigation, music, and call handling.

Price and Value

The Kawasaki Ninja 400 has a starting price of $4,999, while the CFMoto 450SR starts at $5,999. For the additional cost, the 450SR offers a larger engine, better suspension, and a more advanced technology package. However, the Ninja 400 remains a more affordable option, providing a solid value for riders on a budget.

Which Bike is Right for You?

The choice between the Kawasaki Ninja 400 and CFMoto 450SR ultimately depends on your individual preferences and riding style. If you prioritize agility, affordability, and a comfortable riding position, the Ninja 400 is an excellent choice. However, if you desire more power, advanced suspension, and a comprehensive technology package, the 450SR is the better option.

Beyond the Comparison: Deciding Factors

To further assist you in your decision-making process, consider the following factors:

  • Experience: The Ninja 400 is more suitable for beginner and intermediate riders, while the 450SR is better suited for experienced riders.
  • Riding Purpose: The Ninja 400 is ideal for commuting, daily riding, and occasional track days. The 450SR is better suited for spirited riding and track use.
  • Budget: The Ninja 400 is a more affordable option, while the 450SR offers a higher level of performance and technology at a premium price.

Alternatives to Consider

If you are considering the Kawasaki Ninja 400 or CFMoto 450SR, you may also want to explore the following alternatives:

  • Honda CBR500R: A well-rounded middleweight sportbike with a powerful engine and comfortable ergonomics.
  • Yamaha YZF-R3: A lightweight and agile sportbike with a lively engine and precise handling.
  • KTM RC 390: A track-focused sportbike with a powerful single-cylinder engine and aggressive ergonomics.

Questions We Hear a Lot

Q: Which bike is faster, the Ninja 400 or 450SR?
A: The CFMoto 450SR has a slight edge in terms of top speed and acceleration due to its larger engine.

Q: Is the 450SR more comfortable than the Ninja 400?
A: The Ninja 400 offers a more upright and comfortable riding position, while the 450SR has a more aggressive posture.

Q: Does the Ninja 400 have traction control?
A: No, the Kawasaki Ninja 400 does not come equipped with traction control.

Q: Which bike has a better warranty?
A: The Kawasaki Ninja 400 comes with a 12-month/unlimited-mile warranty, while the CFMoto 450SR has a 24-month/unlimited-mile warranty.

Q: Is the Ninja 400 suitable for long-distance riding?
A: Yes, the Ninja 400 can be used for long-distance riding, but it may be less comfortable than a more touring-oriented motorcycle.

Was this page helpful?
Back to top button