Kawasaki Z 650 Vs Ktm Duke 690
What To Know
- With 73 horsepower and 54 lb-ft of torque, the Duke 690 boasts a higher power-to-weight ratio and an aggressive throttle response.
- It lacks some of the conveniences of the Z 650, but it compensates with a ride-by-wire throttle and a slipper clutch.
- The Z 650 is a more versatile and accessible option, while the Duke 690 is a thrilling and uncompromising street weapon.
In the realm of streetfighter motorcycles, two formidable contenders stand out: the Kawasaki Z 650 and the KTM Duke 690. Both bikes boast impressive performance, aggressive styling, and a loyal following. In this comprehensive comparison, we dive into the key differences between these two street-dominating machines to help you make an informed decision.
Engine Performance: Brute Force vs Single-Cylinder Supremacy
The Kawasaki Z 650 wields a potent 649cc parallel-twin engine that delivers a smooth, linear powerband. Its 68 horsepower and 50 lb-ft of torque provide ample acceleration and effortless cruising.
In contrast, the KTM Duke 690 employs a unique 690cc single-cylinder engine. This unconventional powerplant delivers a raw and exhilarating ride. With 73 horsepower and 54 lb-ft of torque, the Duke 690 boasts a higher power-to-weight ratio and an aggressive throttle response.
Handling and Agility: Corner Carving vs Street-Taming
The Kawasaki Z 650 exhibits balanced handling, with a neutral steering feel and a comfortable upright riding position. Its 41mm inverted front forks and preload-adjustable rear shock provide a compliant ride, soaking up bumps with ease.
On the other hand, the KTM Duke 690 excels in agility and cornering prowess. Its WP Apex suspension, consisting of 43mm upside-down forks and a preload-adjustable monoshock, offers exceptional stability and feedback. The Duke 690’s shorter wheelbase and lightweight construction make it a nimble and responsive machine.
Styling and Design: Aggressive vs Urban Rebel
The Kawasaki Z 650 exudes a sleek and understated aggression. Its angular lines, sharp bodywork, and Sugomi-inspired design create a menacing presence on the streets.
The KTM Duke 690, on the other hand, embraces a more urban, streetwise aesthetic. Its exposed trellis frame, orange accents, and aggressive headlamp give it a distinctive and rebellious character.
Technology and Features: Modern Convenience vs Spartan Simplicity
The Kawasaki Z 650 boasts a modern instrument cluster with a digital tachometer, fuel gauge, and gear indicator. It also features LED lighting, an adjustable clutch lever, and a USB charging port.
The KTM Duke 690 takes a more minimalist approach, with a simple LCD display that provides essential information. It lacks some of the conveniences of the Z 650, but it compensates with a ride-by-wire throttle and a slipper clutch.
Price and Value: Bang for Your Buck vs Premium Experience
The Kawasaki Z 650 offers excellent value for money, with a starting price of around $7,000. It delivers a well-rounded package of performance, handling, and features.
The KTM Duke 690 carries a higher price tag, starting at around $9,000. However, it justifies its premium status with its exceptional engine, agility, and unique character.
Key Points: The Ultimate Choice
The Kawasaki Z 650 and the KTM Duke 690 are both excellent streetfighters, but they cater to different tastes and riding styles. The Z 650 is a more versatile and accessible option, while the Duke 690 is a thrilling and uncompromising street weapon. Ultimately, the best choice depends on your individual preferences, budget, and riding experience.
Quick Answers to Your FAQs
Q: Which bike is faster in a straight line?
A: The KTM Duke 690 has a slight edge in acceleration due to its higher power-to-weight ratio.
Q: Which bike has better fuel efficiency?
A: The Kawasaki Z 650 is more fuel-efficient than the KTM Duke 690, with an average fuel consumption of around 50 mpg.
Q: Which bike is more comfortable for long rides?
A: The Kawasaki Z 650 offers a more upright and relaxed riding position, making it more suitable for extended journeys.