Your Toyota companion for all ownership needs
Guide

Battle of the titans: ktm duke 250 vs classic 350 – which one’s the champion?

What To Know

  • When it comes to choosing a motorcycle in India, two names that instantly come to mind are the KTM Duke 250 and the Royal Enfield Classic 350.
  • The KTM Duke 250 comes equipped with a range of advanced features, including a digital instrument cluster, ABS, ride-by-wire throttle, and a slipper clutch.
  • The choice between the KTM Duke 250 and the Royal Enfield Classic 350 ultimately depends on your individual preferences and riding style.

When it comes to choosing a motorcycle in India, two names that instantly come to mind are the KTM Duke 250 and the Royal Enfield Classic 350. Both bikes cater to different tastes and riding styles, but they share a common goal: to provide an unforgettable riding experience. In this comprehensive comparison, we will delve into the key aspects of each bike to help you make an informed decision.

Design and Styling

The KTM Duke 250 exudes a sporty and aggressive stance with its sharp lines and compact dimensions. Its naked design offers a commanding riding position, while the LED headlamp and digital instrument cluster add a modern touch.

In contrast, the Royal Enfield Classic 350 embodies a timeless and classic aesthetic. Its retro styling, with its round headlamp, teardrop-shaped fuel tank, and spoked wheels, evokes a sense of nostalgia.

Engine and Performance

The KTM Duke 250 boasts a liquid-cooled, single-cylinder engine that produces 30 horsepower and 24 Nm of torque. Its high-revving nature delivers a thrilling and responsive ride, making it ideal for urban commuting and spirited weekend rides.

The Royal Enfield Classic 350, on the other hand, features an air-cooled, single-cylinder engine that produces 20 horsepower and 27 Nm of torque. Its low-end torque and relaxed power delivery make it suitable for leisurely cruising and long-distance touring.

Handling and Suspension

The KTM Duke 250’s lightweight chassis and stiff suspension provide agile handling and sharp cornering. Its WP-sourced suspension ensures stability and comfort, even on rough roads.

The Royal Enfield Classic 350’s heavy chassis and softer suspension result in a more relaxed and comfortable ride. Its long wheelbase and low center of gravity provide added stability, making it suitable for both urban and highway riding.

Features and Technology

The KTM Duke 250 comes equipped with a range of advanced features, including a digital instrument cluster, ABS, ride-by-wire throttle, and a slipper clutch. These features enhance the riding experience and safety.

The Royal Enfield Classic 350, on the other hand, focuses on simplicity and practicality. It offers basic features such as a single-pod instrument cluster, halogen headlamp, and a kick-start lever.

Price and Availability

The KTM Duke 250 is priced at approximately INR 2.4 lakhs, while the Royal Enfield Classic 350 starts at around INR 1.9 lakhs. Both bikes are widely available across India through their respective dealerships.

Which Bike Should You Choose?

The choice between the KTM Duke 250 and the Royal Enfield Classic 350 ultimately depends on your individual preferences and riding style. If you prioritize performance, agility, and modern features, the KTM Duke 250 is an excellent choice. If you value classic styling, relaxed cruising, and a more nostalgic riding experience, the Royal Enfield Classic 350 is a worthy contender.

Common Questions and Answers

Q: Which bike has better fuel efficiency?
A: The Royal Enfield Classic 350 typically offers better fuel efficiency than the KTM Duke 250, due to its lower-revving engine and relaxed power delivery.

Q: Which bike is more comfortable for long rides?
A: The Royal Enfield Classic 350’s softer suspension and relaxed riding position make it more comfortable for long-distance touring compared to the KTM Duke 250.

Q: Which bike has a lower maintenance cost?
A: The Royal Enfield Classic 350 generally has lower maintenance costs than the KTM Duke 250, due to its simpler design and fewer electronic components.

Was this page helpful?
Back to top button