Your Toyota companion for all ownership needs
Guide

Street vs track: which bike dominates ktm rc 200 vs kawasaki ninja 300

What To Know

  • The RC 200 features a single 300mm front disc and a 230mm rear disc, while the Ninja 300 boasts a 290mm front disc and a 220mm rear disc.
  • The RC 200 excels in agility, handling, and fuel economy, making it an ideal choice for those seeking a nimble and affordable commuter.
  • The Ninja 300, on the other hand, offers superior power, ABS, and a more comfortable riding position, making it a more versatile and well-rounded motorcycle.

In the realm of entry-level sportbikes, two formidable contenders reign supreme: the KTM RC 200 and the Kawasaki Ninja 300. Both motorcycles offer a thrilling blend of performance, agility, and affordability, making them ideal choices for aspiring riders and seasoned commuters alike. However, which one is the ultimate choice for those seeking a dynamic and exhilarating ride? In this comprehensive comparison, we delve into the key aspects of these two exceptional machines to determine which one emerges victorious.

Performance and Power

At the heart of the KTM RC 200 lies a 199.5cc single-cylinder engine that produces a respectable 25 horsepower and 19.2 Nm of torque. While it may seem modest compared to the Ninja 300, the RC 200’s lightweight chassis and nimble handling more than make up for the power deficit.

The Kawasaki Ninja 300, on the other hand, boasts a more potent 296cc parallel-twin engine that delivers a punchy 39 horsepower and 27 Nm of torque. This superior powertrain provides a more spirited acceleration and a higher top speed, making it a more suitable choice for those seeking a more potent ride.

Handling and Agility

The KTM RC 200 is renowned for its razor-sharp handling and precise cornering abilities. Its compact dimensions, lightweight construction, and aggressive riding position offer unparalleled agility and control. The WP suspension system further enhances its handling prowess, providing excellent feedback and stability.

The Kawasaki Ninja 300 is also a capable handler, but its larger size and weight make it slightly less nimble than the RC 200. However, its longer wheelbase and more relaxed ergonomics offer greater stability and comfort for longer rides.

Braking and Safety

Both the KTM RC 200 and the Kawasaki Ninja 300 come equipped with reliable braking systems. The RC 200 features a single 300mm front disc and a 230mm rear disc, while the Ninja 300 boasts a 290mm front disc and a 220mm rear disc. Both motorcycles offer excellent stopping power and progressive feel.

In terms of safety features, the Ninja 300 comes standard with an Anti-lock Braking System (ABS), which provides enhanced control and prevents wheel lock-ups during hard braking. The RC 200 does not offer ABS as standard, but it is available as an optional extra.

Design and Aesthetics

The KTM RC 200 exudes a sporty and aggressive design that is inspired by KTM’s racing heritage. Its sharp lines, angular bodywork, and dual projector headlamps give it a distinctive and intimidating presence.

The Kawasaki Ninja 300, on the other hand, adopts a more traditional sportbike aesthetic. Its sleek fairing, compact dimensions, and twin headlamps create a visually appealing and aerodynamic silhouette.

Fuel Economy and Practicality

In terms of fuel economy, the KTM RC 200 has a slight advantage over the Kawasaki Ninja 300. Its smaller engine and lighter weight contribute to its impressive mileage, making it a more economical choice for daily commuting.

Both motorcycles offer limited storage space, but the Ninja 300 has a small under-seat compartment that can accommodate a few essential items. The RC 200 does not have any built-in storage space.

Price and Value

The KTM RC 200 and the Kawasaki Ninja 300 are both competitively priced within the entry-level sportbike segment. The RC 200 is typically available at a slightly lower price point, making it a more budget-friendly option for those on a tighter budget.

However, the Ninja 300 offers a more comprehensive package with its more powerful engine, ABS, and slightly more practical design. Its higher price tag is justified by the additional features and performance it provides.

The Verdict

In the battle of the KTM RC 200 vs. Kawasaki Ninja 300, both motorcycles have their strengths and weaknesses. The RC 200 excels in agility, handling, and fuel economy, making it an ideal choice for those seeking a nimble and affordable commuter. The Ninja 300, on the other hand, offers superior power, ABS, and a more comfortable riding position, making it a more versatile and well-rounded motorcycle.

Ultimately, the best choice between these two exceptional machines depends on the individual rider’s preferences and priorities. Those who prioritize handling, agility, and fuel efficiency will find the RC 200 to be an excellent choice. However, those seeking a more powerful, feature-rich, and comfortable motorcycle will be better served by the Ninja 300.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. Which motorcycle is faster, the KTM RC 200 or the Kawasaki Ninja 300?
The Kawasaki Ninja 300 is faster than the KTM RC 200, thanks to its more powerful engine.

2. Which motorcycle has better handling, the KTM RC 200 or the Kawasaki Ninja 300?
The KTM RC 200 has better handling than the Kawasaki Ninja 300, due to its lighter weight and more aggressive riding position.

3. Which motorcycle is more fuel-efficient, the KTM RC 200 or the Kawasaki Ninja 300?
The KTM RC 200 is more fuel-efficient than the Kawasaki Ninja 300, due to its smaller engine and lighter weight.

Was this page helpful?
Back to top button