Your Toyota companion for all ownership needs
Guide

Ktm rc 390 vs ninja 300: a tale of track and street supremacy

What To Know

  • In this comprehensive comparison, we’ll delve into the key differences between the KTM RC 390 and Ninja 300, helping you make an informed decision about which one is the perfect fit for your riding needs.
  • The Ninja 300, on the other hand, offers a more balanced and forgiving ride, with a semi-double cradle frame and Showa suspension that provides a comfortable and predictable ride.
  • Whether you crave the adrenaline rush of track riding or the versatility of an everyday commuter, the KTM RC 390 and Ninja 300 offer compelling options.

The KTM RC 390 and Kawasaki Ninja 300 are two highly acclaimed motorcycles that have captivated the hearts of sportbike enthusiasts worldwide. These machines offer an exhilarating combination of performance, agility, and style, making them ideal for both track days and everyday commuting. In this comprehensive comparison, we’ll delve into the key differences between the KTM RC 390 and Ninja 300, helping you make an informed decision about which one is the perfect fit for your riding needs.

Engine and Performance

The KTM RC 390 boasts a single-cylinder, 373cc engine that delivers 43 horsepower and 26 lb-ft of torque. In contrast, the Ninja 300 features a parallel-twin, 296cc engine that produces 39 horsepower and 18.9 lb-ft of torque. While the KTM has a slight advantage in horsepower, the Ninja’s twin-cylinder configuration provides smoother power delivery and a more refined sound.

Handling and Braking

The KTM RC 390 is renowned for its razor-sharp handling and lightweight chassis. Its tubular steel frame and WP APEX suspension offer exceptional stability and cornering capabilities. The Ninja 300, on the other hand, offers a more balanced and forgiving ride, with a semi-double cradle frame and Showa suspension that provides a comfortable and predictable ride. Both bikes come equipped with ABS as standard, ensuring confident braking in all conditions.

Ergonomics and Comfort

The KTM RC 390 adopts a track-focused riding position, with low handlebars and rearset footpegs. This aggressive stance is ideal for spirited riding, but it can be demanding for long-distance journeys. The Ninja 300, on the other hand, offers a more upright and relaxed riding position, making it more comfortable for extended rides.

Features and Technology

The KTM RC 390 comes with a TFT display that provides a wealth of information, including lap times, gear indicators, and fuel consumption. It also features ride-by-wire throttle, traction control, and cornering ABS. The Ninja 300, while not as technologically advanced, offers a digital speedometer, fuel gauge, and clock.

Price and Value

The KTM RC 390 has a starting price of around $5,500, while the Ninja 300 starts at around $4,900. Both bikes offer excellent value for money, with the KTM commanding a slight premium for its advanced features and track-oriented design.

Which One is Right for You?

The KTM RC 390 is the ideal choice for riders who prioritize performance, handling, and track capabilities. Its aggressive riding position, powerful engine, and advanced electronics make it a joy to ride on the circuit. However, its comfort levels may be compromised for extended rides.

The Ninja 300, on the other hand, is better suited for riders who value comfort, versatility, and affordability. Its balanced handling, comfortable riding position, and reliable engine make it an excellent all-around sportbike.

A Deeper Dive into the KTM RC 390

Engine and Performance

The KTM RC 390’s single-cylinder engine is a marvel of engineering, delivering impressive power and torque for its size. Its lightweight construction contributes to the bike’s overall agility and handling prowess.

Handling and Braking

The RC 390’s tubular steel frame and WP APEX suspension provide exceptional stability and cornering capabilities. Its powerful Brembo brakes offer confident and precise stopping power, ensuring control in all riding conditions.

Electronics and Features

The RC 390’s TFT display and ride-by-wire throttle system provide a user-friendly and intuitive riding experience. Its traction control and cornering ABS enhance safety and control, allowing riders to push the limits with confidence.

A Deeper Dive into the Ninja 300

Engine and Performance

The Ninja 300’s parallel-twin engine offers a smooth and linear power delivery. Its compact design and low weight contribute to the bike’s overall agility and responsiveness.

Handling and Braking

The Ninja 300’s semi-double cradle frame and Showa suspension provide a balanced and forgiving ride. Its Nissin brakes offer ample stopping power, ensuring confidence in various riding conditions.

Comfort and Features

The Ninja 300’s upright riding position and comfortable seat provide a relaxed and enjoyable ride. Its digital speedometer and fuel gauge offer essential information at a glance.

Final Note: The Ultimate Sportbike Choice

Whether you crave the adrenaline rush of track riding or the versatility of an everyday commuter, the KTM RC 390 and Ninja 300 offer compelling options. The KTM is the ultimate choice for performance and handling, while the Ninja shines in comfort and affordability. Ultimately, the best bike for you depends on your individual riding needs and preferences.

Questions We Hear a Lot

Q: Which bike is faster?
A: The KTM RC 390 has a slight advantage in horsepower and top speed.

Q: Which bike is more comfortable for long rides?
A: The Ninja 300 offers a more upright and relaxed riding position, making it more comfortable for extended journeys.

Q: Which bike is more affordable?
A: The Ninja 300 has a lower starting price than the KTM RC 390.

Q: Which bike has better electronics?
A: The KTM RC 390 has a more advanced electronics package, including a TFT display, ride-by-wire throttle, and traction control.

Q: Which bike is better for track riding?
A: The KTM RC 390 is better suited for track riding due to its aggressive riding position, powerful engine, and advanced electronics.

Was this page helpful?
Back to top button