Don’t buy an suv before reading this: mazda cx-50 vs nissan murano comparison

In the realm of midsize SUVs, the Mazda CX-50 and Nissan Murano stand out as compelling choices. Both offer a blend of practicality, style, and performance, but they also have their unique strengths and weaknesses. This comprehensive comparison will delve into the key aspects of these two SUVs, helping you make an informed decision about which one is the right fit for your needs.

Exterior Design

The CX-50 exudes a rugged and adventurous spirit with its bold grille, muscular lines, and pronounced wheel arches. In contrast, the Murano presents a more sleek and urban aesthetic, featuring a sloping roofline and flowing curves. Both SUVs offer a range of exterior colors and trim levels to suit different tastes.

Interior Comfort and Space

Inside, the CX-50 prioritizes driver-centric ergonomics with its intuitive dashboard layout and supportive seats. The Murano offers a more spacious cabin with ample headroom and legroom for all occupants. Both vehicles provide premium materials and comfortable seating, but the Murano’s larger interior dimensions give it an edge in overall comfort.

Technology and Features

The CX-50 comes equipped with Mazda’s i-Activsense suite of safety and driver-assist technologies, including blind-spot monitoring, adaptive cruise control, and lane-departure warning. The Murano counters with Nissan’s Safety Shield 360, which offers a similar range of features. Both SUVs also boast user-friendly infotainment systems with Apple CarPlay and Android Auto integration.

Performance and Fuel Economy

Under the hood, the CX-50 offers a choice of a 2.5-liter naturally aspirated engine or a 2.5-liter turbocharged engine, producing 187 horsepower and 227 horsepower, respectively. The Murano is powered by a 3.5-liter V6 engine that generates 260 horsepower. In terms of fuel economy, the CX-50 has a slight advantage over the Murano, with an EPA-estimated 24 mpg in the city and 30 mpg on the highway for the base engine.

Off-Road Capabilities

The CX-50 is designed with off-road adventures in mind. It features a standard all-wheel drive system, hill descent control, and an off-road-tuned suspension. The Murano, on the other hand, is primarily intended for on-road driving and lacks dedicated off-road features.

Safety and Reliability

Both the CX-50 and Murano have earned high safety ratings from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) and the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS). In terms of reliability, Mazda has a slightly better track record than Nissan, according to J.D. Power and Associates.

Price and Value

The Mazda CX-50 has a starting price of $27,800, while the Nissan Murano starts at $32,510. The CX-50 offers a more affordable entry point, but the Murano provides a more spacious and luxurious interior at a higher price.

Final Note: The Right SUV for Your Needs

The Mazda CX-50 and Nissan Murano are both excellent midsize SUVs with their unique strengths and weaknesses. The CX-50 is an ideal choice for those seeking a rugged and off-road-capable vehicle, while the Murano is a better option for those who prioritize comfort, space, and urban driving. Ultimately, the best choice depends on your individual needs and preferences.

Top Questions Asked

Q: Which SUV has a more powerful engine?
A: The Nissan Murano has a more powerful engine than the Mazda CX-50, with a 3.5-liter V6 producing 260 horsepower compared to the CX-50’s 227 horsepower turbocharged engine.

Q: Which SUV has a better fuel economy?
A: The Mazda CX-50 has a better fuel economy than the Nissan Murano, with an EPA-estimated 24 mpg in the city and 30 mpg on the highway for the base engine, compared to the Murano’s 20 mpg in the city and 28 mpg on the highway.

Q: Which SUV has a larger interior?
A: The Nissan Murano has a larger interior than the Mazda CX-50, with ample headroom and legroom for all occupants.