Your Toyota companion for all ownership needs
Guide

Compact cars with style: nissan kicks vs kia forte – which turns heads?

What To Know

  • The Kicks has an EPA-estimated fuel economy of 31 mpg in the city and 36 mpg on the highway, while the Forte has an EPA-estimated fuel economy of 31 mpg in the city and 41 mpg on the highway with the 2.
  • If you’re looking for a fuel-efficient and affordable compact car with a spacious interior and a good range of features, the Nissan Kicks is a great option.
  • If you’re looking for a more powerful compact car with a slightly more spacious interior and a longer list of available features, the Kia Forte is a great choice.

Compact cars offer a perfect blend of practicality, fuel efficiency, and affordability, making them a popular choice among car buyers. The Nissan Kicks and Kia Forte are two notable contenders in this segment, boasting impressive features and competitive pricing. This in-depth comparison will delve into the key differences between the Nissan Kicks vs Kia Forte, helping you make an informed decision about which one suits your needs best.

Performance and Fuel Efficiency

The Nissan Kicks is powered by a 1.6-liter four-cylinder engine that produces 122 horsepower and 114 lb-ft of torque. This engine is paired with a continuously variable transmission (CVT), providing smooth and efficient power delivery. The Kia Forte, on the other hand, offers a choice of two engines: a 2.0-liter four-cylinder with 147 horsepower and 132 lb-ft of torque, or a 1.6-liter turbocharged four-cylinder with 201 horsepower and 195 lb-ft of torque. Both engines are mated to a six-speed automatic transmission.

In terms of fuel efficiency, the Nissan Kicks slightly edges out the Kia Forte. The Kicks has an EPA-estimated fuel economy of 31 mpg in the city and 36 mpg on the highway, while the Forte has an EPA-estimated fuel economy of 31 mpg in the city and 41 mpg on the highway with the 2.0-liter engine, and 27 mpg in the city and 35 mpg on the highway with the 1.6-liter turbocharged engine.

Interior and Cargo Space

The Nissan Kicks offers a spacious and well-appointed interior with comfortable seats and ample headroom and legroom for both front and rear passengers. The dashboard features a user-friendly layout with a 7-inch touchscreen infotainment system and intuitive controls. The Kicks also boasts 25.3 cubic feet of cargo space with the rear seats up and 53.1 cubic feet with the rear seats folded down.

The Kia Forte also offers a roomy and comfortable interior with supportive seats and generous legroom. The dashboard is modern and stylish, with an 8-inch touchscreen infotainment system that supports Apple CarPlay and Android Auto. The Forte has 15.3 cubic feet of cargo space with the rear seats up and 53.1 cubic feet with the rear seats folded down.

Technology and Safety Features

Both the Nissan Kicks and Kia Forte come equipped with a range of advanced technology and safety features. The Kicks features a standard 7-inch touchscreen infotainment system with Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, Bluetooth connectivity, and a rearview camera. It also offers available features such as a Bose premium audio system, navigation, and a 360-degree surround-view camera.

The Forte offers a standard 8-inch touchscreen infotainment system with Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, Bluetooth connectivity, and a rearview camera. It also offers available features such as a Harman Kardon premium audio system, navigation, and a blind-spot monitoring system.

In terms of safety, the Nissan Kicks has received a five-star overall safety rating from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), while the Kia Forte has received a four-star overall safety rating. Both vehicles come standard with a full suite of airbags, anti-lock brakes, and electronic stability control.

Price and Value

The Nissan Kicks has a starting price of $19,500, while the Kia Forte has a starting price of $18,895. The Kicks offers a lower starting price, but the Forte offers a more powerful engine and a slightly more spacious interior.

In terms of value, both the Nissan Kicks and Kia Forte offer a lot of features for the price. The Kicks offers a comfortable and well-equipped interior, excellent fuel efficiency, and a wide range of technology and safety features. The Forte offers a more powerful engine, a slightly more spacious interior, and a competitive price point.

Which One is Right for You?

Ultimately, the best choice between the Nissan Kicks vs Kia Forte depends on your individual needs and preferences. If you’re looking for a fuel-efficient and affordable compact car with a spacious interior and a good range of features, the Nissan Kicks is a great option. If you’re looking for a more powerful compact car with a slightly more spacious interior and a longer list of available features, the Kia Forte is a great choice.

In a nutshell: Making the Right Decision

The Nissan Kicks and Kia Forte are both excellent compact cars that offer a lot of value for the price. By carefully considering the key differences between the two vehicles, you can make an informed decision about which one is the right choice for your lifestyle and budget.

What You Need to Learn

1. Which car has a more powerful engine?
The Kia Forte offers a more powerful engine with 201 horsepower and 195 lb-ft of torque, compared to the Nissan Kicks‘ 122 horsepower and 114 lb-ft of torque.

2. Which car has a more spacious interior?
The Kia Forte offers a slightly more spacious interior with 15.3 cubic feet of cargo space with the rear seats up and 53.1 cubic feet with the rear seats folded down, compared to the Nissan Kicks‘ 25.3 cubic feet of cargo space with the rear seats up and 53.1 cubic feet with the rear seats folded down.

3. Which car has a better fuel economy?
The Nissan Kicks has a slightly better fuel economy with an EPA-estimated fuel economy of 31 mpg in the city and 36 mpg on the highway, compared to the Kia Forte’s EPA-estimated fuel economy of 31 mpg in the city and 41 mpg on the highway with the 2.0-liter engine, and 27 mpg in the city and 35 mpg on the highway with the 1.6-liter turbocharged engine.

Back to top button