Your Toyota companion for all ownership needs
Guide

Fuel-efficient face-off: nissan qashqai vs. toyota yaris mileage showdown

What To Know

  • In terms of fuel efficiency, the Nissan Qashqai achieves an EPA-estimated 26 mpg in the city and 33 mpg on the highway with the CVT.
  • The Toyota Yaris, with its smaller engine, boasts better fuel economy, delivering up to 32 mpg in the city and 40 mpg on the highway with the CVT.
  • However, the Toyota Yaris offers a more comprehensive suite of safety features as standard, which may make it a better value for some buyers.

In the realm of compact crossovers, two formidable contenders emerge: the Nissan Qashqai and the Toyota Yaris. Both vehicles offer a blend of practicality, style, and efficiency, catering to the needs of urban dwellers and adventure seekers alike. In this comprehensive comparison, we delve into the key aspects of each vehicle to determine which one reigns supreme in this competitive segment.

Performance and Fuel Efficiency

The Nissan Qashqai is powered by a 2.0-liter four-cylinder engine that generates 141 horsepower and 147 lb-ft of torque. It comes standard with a six-speed manual transmission, while a continuously variable transmission (CVT) is available as an option. The Toyota Yaris, on the other hand, is equipped with a smaller 1.5-liter four-cylinder engine that produces 106 horsepower and 103 lb-ft of torque. It is paired with either a six-speed manual transmission or a CVT.

In terms of fuel efficiency, the Nissan Qashqai achieves an EPA-estimated 26 mpg in the city and 33 mpg on the highway with the CVT. The Toyota Yaris, with its smaller engine, boasts better fuel economy, delivering up to 32 mpg in the city and 40 mpg on the highway with the CVT.

Interior Space and Comfort

The Nissan Qashqai offers a spacious and comfortable interior with ample headroom and legroom for both front and rear passengers. The seats are supportive and provide good visibility, making it easy to navigate in urban environments. The Toyota Yaris, while smaller in size, still offers a surprisingly spacious cabin with comfortable seating for four adults. However, rear-seat legroom may be limited for taller individuals.

Both vehicles come well-equipped with features that enhance interior comfort, such as automatic climate control, power windows, and a touchscreen infotainment system. The Nissan Qashqai has a slight edge in terms of cargo space, offering 23.8 cubic feet behind the rear seats and 67.8 cubic feet with the seats folded down. The Toyota Yaris has a smaller cargo area, with 15.9 cubic feet behind the rear seats and 47.6 cubic feet with the seats folded down.

Technology and Safety Features

The Nissan Qashqai and Toyota Yaris both come equipped with a range of advanced technology and safety features. Standard features include a rearview camera, Bluetooth connectivity, and a variety of driver-assist systems such as lane departure warning and blind-spot monitoring.

The Nissan Qashqai offers more advanced technology options, such as a panoramic sunroof, a Bose premium audio system, and a 360-degree camera. The Toyota Yaris, on the other hand, has a more comprehensive suite of safety features, including adaptive cruise control, lane keeping assist, and automatic emergency braking.

Handling and Off-Road Capabilities

The Nissan Qashqai is designed with a focus on urban driving, offering a comfortable and responsive ride on paved roads. It features a suspension system that absorbs bumps and provides good stability. The Toyota Yaris, with its smaller size and lighter weight, is more agile and nimble in city traffic. However, it may struggle on rougher terrain due to its lack of ground clearance.

Neither vehicle is particularly well-suited for off-road adventures, but the Nissan Qashqai offers slightly better off-road capabilities with its optional all-wheel drive system. The Toyota Yaris is only available with front-wheel drive, which limits its off-road capabilities.

Pricing and Value

The Nissan Qashqai has a starting price of $24,990 for the base S trim. The Toyota Yaris, on the other hand, starts at a lower price of $15,600 for the base LE trim. However, the Toyota Yaris offers a more comprehensive suite of safety features as standard, which may make it a better value for some buyers.

Which Vehicle Is Right for You?

Ultimately, the choice between the Nissan Qashqai and the Toyota Yaris depends on your individual needs and preferences. If you prioritize interior space, technology, and off-road capabilities, the Nissan Qashqai is a better choice. However, if you value fuel efficiency, safety features, and a lower price point, the Toyota Yaris is a more suitable option.

Summary

The Nissan Qashqai and Toyota Yaris are both compelling choices in the compact crossover segment. The Nissan Qashqai offers a spacious interior, advanced technology, and off-road capabilities, while the Toyota Yaris impresses with its fuel efficiency, safety features, and affordability. By carefully considering the key aspects discussed in this comparison, you can make an informed decision on which vehicle best meets your needs and desires.

Information You Need to Know

1. Which vehicle has the better fuel economy?

The Toyota Yaris has better fuel economy than the Nissan Qashqai, with an EPA-estimated 32 mpg in the city and 40 mpg on the highway.

2. Which vehicle has more interior space?

The Nissan Qashqai has more interior space than the Toyota Yaris, offering ample headroom and legroom for both front and rear passengers.

3. Which vehicle has more advanced technology features?

The Nissan Qashqai offers more advanced technology features than the Toyota Yaris, such as a panoramic sunroof, a Bose premium audio system, and a 360-degree camera.

4. Which vehicle has better safety features?

The Toyota Yaris has a more comprehensive suite of safety features than the Nissan Qashqai, including adaptive cruise control, lane keeping assist, and automatic emergency braking.

5. Which vehicle is more affordable?

The Toyota Yaris is more affordable than the Nissan Qashqai, with a starting price of $15,600 compared to $24,990.

Was this page helpful?
Back to top button