The ultimate suv battle: nissan rogue vs mazda cx-50 compared in every way
What To Know
- The CX-50, however, has a slight edge in safety technology, offering a wider range of advanced driver-assist systems such as traffic jam assist and blind spot monitoring with rear cross-traffic alert.
- The Nissan Rogue has a slightly better fuel economy rating than the Mazda CX-50, with an EPA-estimated 28 mpg combined compared to 27 mpg combined for the CX-50’s 2.
- Both the Nissan Rogue and the Mazda CX-50 offer comfortable and well-appointed interiors, but the Rogue has a slight edge in terms of space and overall comfort.
In the competitive realm of compact SUVs, the Nissan Rogue and the Mazda CX-50 stand out as formidable contenders. Both vehicles boast impressive features, capable performance, and appealing designs. However, discerning buyers may wonder which one reigns supreme. This comprehensive comparison aims to shed light on the key differences between the Nissan Rogue and the Mazda CX-50, empowering you to make an informed decision.
Exterior Styling
The Nissan Rogue exudes a modern and sleek aesthetic, with its distinctive V-Motion grille and sharp character lines. The Mazda CX-50, on the other hand, embraces a more rugged and adventurous look, featuring a bold front end and prominent black cladding. Both SUVs offer a choice of vibrant colors to complement their striking exteriors.
Interior Design and Space
Inside, the Nissan Rogue offers a spacious and well-appointed cabin. The materials are high-quality, and the infotainment system is intuitive and user-friendly. The Mazda CX-50’s interior is equally impressive, with a minimalist design and premium materials. However, the CX-50’s cargo space is slightly smaller than the Rogue’s, which may be a consideration for those who prioritize hauling capacity.
Powertrain and Performance
The Nissan Rogue is powered by a 2.5-liter four-cylinder engine that produces 181 horsepower and 181 lb-ft of torque. The Mazda CX-50 offers two engine options: a 2.5-liter four-cylinder with 187 horsepower and 186 lb-ft of torque, and a 2.5-liter turbocharged four-cylinder with 256 horsepower and 320 lb-ft of torque. The CX-50’s turbocharged engine provides significantly more power and torque, resulting in superior acceleration and towing capabilities.
Handling and Ride Quality
The Nissan Rogue provides a comfortable and composed ride, with responsive handling. The Mazda CX-50, however, excels in handling dynamics. Its G-Vectoring Control Plus system enhances cornering stability and reduces body roll, giving drivers a more engaging driving experience.
Fuel Economy
The Nissan Rogue’s 2.5-liter engine returns an EPA-estimated 28 mpg combined, while the Mazda CX-50’s 2.5-liter engine achieves 27 mpg combined. The CX-50’s turbocharged engine has a lower fuel economy rating of 23 mpg combined.
Safety Features
Both the Nissan Rogue and the Mazda CX-50 come equipped with a comprehensive suite of safety features, including lane departure warning, automatic emergency braking, and adaptive cruise control. The CX-50, however, has a slight edge in safety technology, offering a wider range of advanced driver-assist systems such as traffic jam assist and blind spot monitoring with rear cross-traffic alert.
Price and Value
The Nissan Rogue has a starting price of $27,400, while the Mazda CX-50 starts at $27,800. Both vehicles offer a range of trim levels with varying features and amenities, allowing buyers to customize their SUV to their specific needs and budget.
The Verdict: Which SUV is Right for You?
Choosing between the Nissan Rogue and the Mazda CX-50 ultimately depends on your individual preferences and priorities. If you value a spacious interior, comfortable ride, and fuel efficiency, the Nissan Rogue may be a better fit. However, if you prioritize performance, handling, and advanced safety features, the Mazda CX-50 is the superior choice.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: Which SUV has a more powerful engine?
A: The Mazda CX-50, with its 2.5-liter turbocharged engine, offers significantly more power and torque than the Nissan Rogue.
Q: Which SUV has a better fuel economy rating?
A: The Nissan Rogue has a slightly better fuel economy rating than the Mazda CX-50, with an EPA-estimated 28 mpg combined compared to 27 mpg combined for the CX-50’s 2.5-liter engine.
Q: Which SUV has a more comfortable interior?
A: Both the Nissan Rogue and the Mazda CX-50 offer comfortable and well-appointed interiors, but the Rogue has a slight edge in terms of space and overall comfort.
Q: Which SUV has a better safety rating?
A: The Mazda CX-50 has a slight edge in safety technology, offering a wider range of advanced driver-assist systems.
Q: Which SUV is better for off-roading?
A: The Mazda CX-50 is better suited for off-roading, with its rugged exterior and available all-wheel drive system with terrain modes.