N250 vs hornet 2.0: which budget-friendly bike reigns supreme?
What To Know
- The Pulsar N250 features a perimeter frame and a telescopic front suspension with a monoshock at the rear.
- 0, on the other hand, utilizes a diamond-type frame and a telescopic front suspension with a mono-shock at the rear.
- The Pulsar N250 features a 300mm front disc brake and a 230mm rear disc brake, while the Hornet 2.
In the realm of street-dominating motorcycles, the Pulsar N250 and the Honda Hornet 2.0 stand as formidable contenders. Both bikes boast impressive performance, sleek aesthetics, and advanced features, making them worthy adversaries in the quest for street supremacy. This comprehensive comparison delves into the intricacies of each motorcycle, highlighting their strengths and weaknesses to help you make an informed decision.
Design and Aesthetics
The Pulsar N250 exudes an aggressive and sporty stance, with sharp lines and muscular contours. Its twin-pod projector headlights and LED taillight lend a modern and intimidating presence. In contrast, the Hornet 2.0 adopts a more understated and refined design, featuring a muscular fuel tank, sleek body panels, and a sharp LED headlight. Both bikes offer a comfortable and ergonomic riding position, ensuring long-distance riding comfort.
Engine and Performance
The Pulsar N250 is powered by a 249.07cc single-cylinder, oil-cooled engine that churns out 24.5 PS of power and 21.5 Nm of torque. The Honda Hornet 2.0, on the other hand, is equipped with a 184.4cc single-cylinder, air-cooled engine that produces 17.2 PS of power and 16.1 Nm of torque. While the Pulsar N250 offers a significant advantage in terms of power and torque, the Hornet 2.0 compensates with its lighter weight and smoother power delivery.
Handling and Suspension
The Pulsar N250 features a perimeter frame and a telescopic front suspension with a monoshock at the rear. The Hornet 2.0, on the other hand, utilizes a diamond-type frame and a telescopic front suspension with a mono-shock at the rear. Both bikes provide agile handling and stability around corners, but the Pulsar N250’s stiffer suspension setup offers better handling at higher speeds.
Features and Technology
The Pulsar N250 comes equipped with a semi-digital instrument cluster, a USB charging port, and a projector headlight. The Hornet 2.0 boasts a fully digital instrument cluster, a full-LED lighting system, and a hazard light switch. Additionally, the Hornet 2.0 offers a slightly wider rear tire, providing enhanced grip and stability.
Safety and Braking
Both the Pulsar N250 and the Hornet 2.0 prioritize safety with a single-channel ABS system. The Pulsar N250 features a 300mm front disc brake and a 230mm rear disc brake, while the Hornet 2.0 uses a 276mm front disc brake and a 220mm rear disc brake. The Pulsar N250’s larger front disc provides better stopping power, while the Hornet 2.0’s slightly smaller rear disc offers adequate stopping performance.
Fuel Efficiency and Mileage
The Pulsar N250 delivers an impressive fuel efficiency of around 35-40 kmpl, while the Honda Hornet 2.0 offers a marginally better fuel efficiency of around 40-45 kmpl. Both bikes have a similar fuel tank capacity of 14 liters, providing a decent riding range.
Price and Value for Money
The Pulsar N250 is priced slightly lower than the Honda Hornet 2.0, making it a more affordable option. However, the Hornet 2.0 offers a slightly higher level of refinement and premium features, making it a more compelling choice for some riders. Ultimately, the best value for money depends on your individual preferences and budget.
Verdict: Choosing the Right Bike
The Pulsar N250 and the Honda Hornet 2.0 are both excellent street motorcycles that cater to different riding styles and preferences. If you seek a powerful and aggressive machine with impressive performance and handling, the Pulsar N250 is a formidable choice. However, if you prioritize refinement, fuel efficiency, and a more understated design, the Honda Hornet 2.0 is the ideal companion.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: Which bike has a more powerful engine?
A: The Pulsar N250 has a more powerful engine with 24.5 PS of power compared to the Hornet 2.0’s 17.2 PS.
Q: Which bike has better fuel efficiency?
A: The Honda Hornet 2.0 has slightly better fuel efficiency, delivering around 40-45 kmpl compared to the Pulsar N250’s 35-40 kmpl.
Q: Which bike is more affordable?
A: The Pulsar N250 is priced slightly lower than the Honda Hornet 2.0, offering a more affordable option.