Your Toyota companion for all ownership needs
Guide

Cargo van battle: ram promaster city vs. ford transit connect – which will rule the roads?

What To Know

  • This comprehensive comparison will delve into the key differences between the Ram ProMaster City Cargo Van and the Ford Transit Connect, helping you determine which van is the perfect fit for your business needs.
  • In terms of fuel economy, the Transit Connect EcoBoost has an EPA-estimated rating of 20 mpg in the city and 27 mpg on the highway, while the ProMaster City Cargo Van delivers slightly lower numbers of 19 mpg city and 24 mpg highway.
  • Both the Ram ProMaster City Cargo Van and the Ford Transit Connect are excellent choices for businesses seeking a compact and versatile cargo van.

The battle for supremacy in the compact cargo van segment rages on between two formidable contenders: the Ram ProMaster City Cargo Van and the Ford Transit Connect. Both vehicles offer a blend of functionality, efficiency, and reliability, making them ideal for businesses of all sizes. However, each van has its unique strengths and weaknesses, which can influence your decision. This comprehensive comparison will delve into the key differences between the Ram ProMaster City Cargo Van and the Ford Transit Connect, helping you determine which van is the perfect fit for your business needs.

Cargo Capacity and Versatility

The Ram ProMaster City Cargo Van boasts an impressive cargo capacity of 131.7 cubic feet, while the Ford Transit Connect offers a slightly smaller cargo volume of 123.4 cubic feet. However, the Transit Connect’s interior height of 57.8 inches is marginally greater than the ProMaster City’s 56.5 inches, providing more headroom for taller items. Both vans feature a variety of cargo tie-downs and shelving options to maximize storage efficiency.

Powertrain and Fuel Economy

Under the hood, the Ram ProMaster City Cargo Van is powered by a 2.4-liter Tigershark engine that generates 178 horsepower and 174 lb-ft of torque. The Ford Transit Connect, on the other hand, offers a choice of two engines: a 2.0-liter EcoBoost inline-four with 200 horsepower and 200 lb-ft of torque, or a 2.5-liter Duratec inline-four with 169 horsepower and 171 lb-ft of torque. In terms of fuel economy, the Transit Connect EcoBoost has an EPA-estimated rating of 20 mpg in the city and 27 mpg on the highway, while the ProMaster City Cargo Van delivers slightly lower numbers of 19 mpg city and 24 mpg highway.

Payload and Towing Capacity

When it comes to payload capacity, the Ram ProMaster City Cargo Van takes the lead with a maximum payload of 1,890 pounds. The Ford Transit Connect is not far behind, offering a payload capacity of 1,620 pounds. In terms of towing capacity, the ProMaster City Cargo Van has a maximum towing capacity of 2,000 pounds, while the Transit Connect can tow up to 2,500 pounds.

Safety Features

Both the Ram ProMaster City Cargo Van and the Ford Transit Connect come equipped with a comprehensive suite of safety features. Standard safety features on the ProMaster City Cargo Van include traction control, electronic stability control, and hill start assist. The Transit Connect offers similar features, along with additional options like adaptive cruise control, lane departure warning, and blind-spot monitoring.

Technology and Connectivity

In terms of technology and connectivity, the Ford Transit Connect has a slight edge over the Ram ProMaster City Cargo Van. The Transit Connect comes standard with the SYNC 3 infotainment system, which features a touchscreen display, Bluetooth connectivity, and Apple CarPlay and Android Auto compatibility. The ProMaster City Cargo Van offers a more basic infotainment system with a smaller touchscreen and limited connectivity options.

Price and Value

The Ram ProMaster City Cargo Van starts at a slightly lower price than the Ford Transit Connect. However, the Transit Connect offers a wider range of trim levels and options, which allows for more customization and flexibility. Ultimately, the best value for your money will depend on your specific business needs and budget constraints.

Which Van is Right for You?

The choice between the Ram ProMaster City Cargo Van and the Ford Transit Connect ultimately depends on your specific business requirements. If you prioritize cargo capacity, payload capacity, and a lower price point, the ProMaster City Cargo Van is a solid choice. However, if you value fuel efficiency, advanced safety features, and a more comprehensive technology suite, the Transit Connect may be a better fit.

The Ultimate Verdict

Both the Ram ProMaster City Cargo Van and the Ford Transit Connect are excellent choices for businesses seeking a compact and versatile cargo van. The ProMaster City Cargo Van offers a spacious cargo area, a strong payload capacity, and a competitive price point. The Transit Connect, on the other hand, provides better fuel economy, more advanced safety features, and a more comprehensive infotainment system. By carefully considering your business needs and budget, you can make an informed decision and choose the van that best meets your requirements.

Basics You Wanted To Know

Q1. Which van has a higher payload capacity?
A1. The Ram ProMaster City Cargo Van has a higher payload capacity of 1,890 pounds compared to the Ford Transit Connect‘s 1,620 pounds.

Q2. Which van offers better fuel economy?
A2. The Ford Transit Connect EcoBoost engine offers better fuel economy than the Ram ProMaster City Cargo Van, with an EPA-estimated rating of 20 mpg in the city and 27 mpg on the highway.

Q3. Which van has more advanced safety features?
A3. The Ford Transit Connect offers more advanced safety features than the Ram ProMaster City Cargo Van, including adaptive cruise control, lane departure warning, and blind-spot monitoring.

Q4. Which van has a lower starting price?
A4. The Ram ProMaster City Cargo Van has a lower starting price than the Ford Transit Connect.

Q5. Which van is better for towing?
A5. The Ford Transit Connect has a higher towing capacity of 2,500 pounds compared to the Ram ProMaster City Cargo Van‘s 2,000 pounds.

Was this page helpful?
Back to top button