Van life unveiled: ram promaster vs. ford transit: a comprehensive guide to choosing your mobile home

When it comes to choosing the perfect van for your nomadic adventures, two giants stand out: the Ram ProMaster and the Ford Transit. Both these behemoths offer a spacious interior, reliable performance, and customizable features that make them ideal for van life. But which one reigns supreme? Let’s dive into a comprehensive comparison of the Ram ProMaster vs. Ford Transit van life to help you make an informed decision.

Interior Space and Layout

The Ram ProMaster boasts a cavernous interior with a generous headroom of up to 82 inches and a cargo capacity of up to 5,249 cubic feet. Its high roof and wide stance provide ample space for sleeping, storage, and living comfortably. The Ford Transit offers a slightly smaller interior, with a maximum headroom of 81.5 inches and a cargo capacity of up to 4,873 cubic feet. However, its boxy shape and rear-wheel-drive configuration allow for better maneuverability in tight spaces.

Performance and Reliability

Both the Ram ProMaster and the Ford Transit are powered by robust engines that provide ample power for highway cruising and off-road adventures. The Ram ProMaster comes standard with a 3.6-liter V6 engine that delivers 280 horsepower and 260 lb-ft of torque, while the Ford Transit offers a choice of a 3.5-liter V6 or a 3.2-liter inline-5 diesel engine. The Transit’s diesel option provides better fuel economy and towing capacity, making it more suitable for long-distance travel.

Safety and Features

Safety is paramount when living on the road. Both the Ram ProMaster and the Ford Transit come equipped with a range of safety features, including airbags, anti-lock brakes, and stability control. However, the Ford Transit offers a more comprehensive suite of advanced safety features, such as lane departure warning, blind-spot monitoring, and adaptive cruise control.

Customization Options

Van life is all about making your home on wheels your own. The Ram ProMaster and the Ford Transit provide a wide array of customization options to suit your unique needs. Both offer various roof heights, wheelbases, and interior configurations. The Ram ProMaster’s high roof option allows for a full-size standing height, while the Ford Transit’s extended wheelbase provides extra space for a larger living area.

Fuel Efficiency and Maintenance

Fuel efficiency is a crucial consideration for long-term van life. The Ram ProMaster’s V6 engine delivers a combined fuel economy of 19 mpg, while the Ford Transit’s V6 engine provides 18 mpg. The Transit’s diesel option offers a significant advantage with a combined fuel economy of 26 mpg. Maintenance costs for both vans are comparable, with regular oil changes and tire rotations being the primary expenses.

Price and Value

Pricing for the Ram ProMaster starts around $35,000, while the Ford Transit has a slightly higher starting price of $37,000. However, the Transit’s more comprehensive safety features and better fuel economy may justify the additional cost. Ultimately, the best value depends on your specific priorities and budget.

The Verdict

Choosing between the Ram ProMaster and the Ford Transit van life is a matter of personal preference and specific needs. If you prioritize interior space, customization options, and a high roof, the Ram ProMaster is an excellent choice. However, if you value fuel efficiency, advanced safety features, and better maneuverability, the Ford Transit is the ideal companion for your nomadic adventures.

FAQ

1. Which van has a higher roof height?
The Ram ProMaster offers a higher roof height of up to 82 inches, while the Ford Transit has a maximum roof height of 81.5 inches.

2. Which van has a better fuel economy?
The Ford Transit’s diesel option provides the best fuel economy at 26 mpg combined, while the Ram ProMaster‘s V6 engine delivers 19 mpg combined.

3. Which van is more reliable?
Both the Ram ProMaster and the Ford Transit have good reliability ratings, with the Transit slightly edging out the ProMaster in J.D. Power’s dependability studies.