Your Toyota companion for all ownership needs
Guide

Crosstrek comparison: unveiling the differences between utility and wagon models

What To Know

  • The Subaru Crosstrek is a versatile vehicle that combines the utility of an SUV with the versatility of a wagon.
  • The Subaru Crosstrek wagon starts at a lower price than the utility model, making it a more affordable option for budget-conscious buyers.
  • The wagon has slightly better fuel economy in city driving, while the utility has a slight advantage on the highway.

The Subaru Crosstrek is a versatile vehicle that combines the utility of an SUV with the versatility of a wagon. However, the Crosstrek comes in two distinct body styles: a traditional wagon and a more rugged utility model. This blog post will delve into the key differences between the Subaru Crosstrek utility vs. wagon, helping you make an informed decision about which model best suits your needs.

Space and Cargo Capacity

The Crosstrek wagon offers more cargo space than the utility model, with 55.3 cubic feet of space with the rear seats folded down compared to 43.1 cubic feet in the utility. The wagon’s larger cargo area makes it ideal for hauling bulky items, such as luggage, camping gear, or sports equipment.

Ground Clearance and Off-Road Capability

The Crosstrek utility stands out with its higher ground clearance of 8.7 inches, compared to 8.2 inches in the wagon. This increased ground clearance enhances the utility’s off-road capabilities, allowing it to navigate rough terrain with greater ease.

Exterior Appearance

While both the wagon and utility share a similar overall design, there are subtle exterior differences. The utility model features a more rugged appearance, with black plastic body cladding and a more pronounced grille. The wagon, on the other hand, presents a more refined and urban aesthetic.

Powertrain and Fuel Economy

The Crosstrek wagon and utility share the same powertrain, featuring a 2.5-liter four-cylinder engine that produces 182 horsepower and 176 lb-ft of torque. Both models are available with either a six-speed manual transmission or a continuously variable transmission (CVT). Fuel economy is comparable between the two models, with the wagon slightly edging out the utility in city driving.

Features and Technology

Both the Crosstrek wagon and utility come well-equipped with a range of standard features, including a 6.5-inch touchscreen infotainment system, Apple CarPlay and Android Auto compatibility, and a rearview camera. However, the utility model offers some exclusive features, such as a more advanced infotainment system with an 8-inch touchscreen and navigation.

Price and Value

The Subaru Crosstrek wagon starts at a lower price than the utility model, making it a more affordable option for budget-conscious buyers. However, the utility model offers additional capabilities and features that may justify its higher price tag for those seeking a more versatile vehicle.

Which Model is Right for You?

The best Subaru Crosstrek model for you depends on your specific needs and preferences. If you prioritize cargo space and overall versatility, the wagon is an excellent choice. If you value off-road capability and a more rugged exterior, the utility model is a better fit.

Final Note: Making the Perfect Choice

Whether you choose the Subaru Crosstrek wagon or utility, you’ll get a versatile and capable vehicle that meets your needs. By carefully considering the differences outlined in this blog post, you can make an informed decision that will ensure you enjoy a perfect match for your driving lifestyle.

Quick Answers to Your FAQs

Q: Which model has more ground clearance?
A: The Crosstrek utility has a higher ground clearance of 8.7 inches, compared to 8.2 inches in the wagon.

Q: Is the wagon more fuel-efficient than the utility?
A: The wagon has slightly better fuel economy in city driving, while the utility has a slight advantage on the highway.

Q: Which model offers more cargo space?
A: The wagon has more cargo space, with 55.3 cubic feet with the rear seats folded down compared to 43.1 cubic feet in the utility.

Was this page helpful?
Back to top button