Subaru crosstrek vs mazda cx-3: battle of the small suvs
What To Know
- The Crosstrek achieves EPA-estimated ratings of 27 mpg in the city and 34 mpg on the highway, while the CX-3 gets 24 mpg in the city and 31 mpg on the highway with the 2.
- The Subaru Crosstrek is the ideal choice for those seeking a versatile and capable subcompact SUV with excellent off-road capabilities and a spacious interior.
- The Mazda CX-3, on the other hand, is a better option for those who prioritize on-road performance, a premium interior, and a more affordable price tag.
In the realm of subcompact SUVs, two formidable contenders emerge: the Subaru Crosstrek and the Mazda CX-3. These vehicles offer a blend of versatility, efficiency, and ruggedness, making them popular choices for adventurers and urban dwellers alike. In this comprehensive comparison, we delve into the key differences between the Subaru Crosstrek vs. Mazda CX-3 to help you make an informed decision.
Performance and Fuel Efficiency
Under the hood, the Subaru Crosstrek boasts a 2.5-liter flat-four engine that produces 182 horsepower and 176 lb-ft of torque. Paired with a continuously variable transmission (CVT), the Crosstrek provides smooth and responsive acceleration. The Mazda CX-3, on the other hand, offers a choice between two engine options: a 2.0-liter inline-four producing 148 horsepower and 146 lb-ft of torque, and a 2.5-liter inline-four delivering 186 horsepower and 186 lb-ft of torque. Both engines are mated to a six-speed automatic transmission.
In terms of fuel efficiency, the Subaru Crosstrek has a slight edge over the Mazda CX-3. The Crosstrek achieves EPA-estimated ratings of 27 mpg in the city and 34 mpg on the highway, while the CX-3 gets 24 mpg in the city and 31 mpg on the highway with the 2.0-liter engine, and 22 mpg in the city and 29 mpg on the highway with the 2.5-liter engine.
Handling and Off-Roading Capabilities
The Subaru Crosstrek has a reputation for its exceptional off-road capabilities, thanks to its standard all-wheel drive system and X-Mode terrain management system. X-Mode optimizes engine output, transmission settings, and stability control for enhanced traction in challenging conditions. The Crosstrek also boasts a higher ground clearance of 8.7 inches compared to the CX-3’s 6.1 inches.
The Mazda CX-3 is more geared towards on-road performance, with its focus on agility and handling. It features a G-Vectoring Control system that enhances cornering stability by adjusting engine torque and steering response. However, the CX-3’s lower ground clearance limits its off-roading abilities.
Interior Space and Comfort
Inside, the Subaru Crosstrek offers a spacious cabin with ample headroom and legroom for both front and rear passengers. The seats are supportive and comfortable, even on long journeys. The cargo area provides 20.8 cubic feet of space behind the second row of seats, which can be expanded to 55.3 cubic feet with the seats folded down.
The Mazda CX-3 offers a more compact cabin, with slightly less legroom in the rear seats. However, the seats are still comfortable and supportive. The cargo area is smaller than the Crosstrek’s, with 12.1 cubic feet of space behind the second row of seats and 44.8 cubic feet with the seats folded down.
Technology and Safety Features
Both the Subaru Crosstrek and Mazda CX-3 come well-equipped with a range of technology and safety features. The Crosstrek offers a standard 6.5-inch touchscreen infotainment system with Apple CarPlay and Android Auto compatibility, as well as a suite of safety features including adaptive cruise control, lane departure warning, and automatic emergency braking.
The Mazda CX-3 also features a 7-inch touchscreen infotainment system with Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, as well as a variety of safety features such as blind-spot monitoring, rear cross-traffic alert, and lane-keeping assist.
Price and Value
The Subaru Crosstrek has a starting price of $23,545 for the base trim, while the Mazda CX-3 starts at $20,650. The Crosstrek offers more standard features and a more spacious interior, while the CX-3 has a more premium feel and better handling. Ultimately, the best value depends on your individual needs and preferences.
Which One is Right for You?
The Subaru Crosstrek is the ideal choice for those seeking a versatile and capable subcompact SUV with excellent off-road capabilities and a spacious interior. The Mazda CX-3, on the other hand, is a better option for those who prioritize on-road performance, a premium interior, and a more affordable price tag.
The Cross-Check: A Detailed Comparison
| Feature | Subaru Crosstrek | Mazda CX-3 |
| — | — | — |
| Engine | 2.5-liter flat-four | 2.0-liter inline-four (148 hp, 146 lb-ft) or 2.5-liter inline-four (186 hp, 186 lb-ft) |
| Transmission | Continuously variable transmission (CVT) | Six-speed automatic transmission |
| Fuel Economy (EPA estimated) | 27 mpg city / 34 mpg highway | 24 mpg city / 31 mpg highway (2.0-liter engine) or 22 mpg city / 29 mpg highway (2.5-liter engine) |
| Ground Clearance | 8.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| All-Wheel Drive | Standard | Available (Grand Touring trim only) |
| Cargo Space | 20.8 cubic feet (behind second row) / 55.3 cubic feet (seats folded) | 12.1 cubic feet (behind second row) / 44.8 cubic feet (seats folded) |
| Price (starting) | $23,545 | $20,650 |
Answers to Your Most Common Questions
Q: Which vehicle has better fuel efficiency?
A: The Subaru Crosstrek has slightly better fuel efficiency than the Mazda CX-3.
Q: Which vehicle has a more spacious interior?
A: The Subaru Crosstrek offers a more spacious interior with more headroom, legroom, and cargo space.
Q: Which vehicle is better for off-roading?
A: The Subaru Crosstrek has better off-road capabilities thanks to its standard all-wheel drive system and X-Mode terrain management system.
Q: Which vehicle has a more premium interior?
A: The Mazda CX-3 has a more premium interior with higher-quality materials and a more refined design.
Q: Which vehicle is more affordable?
A: The Mazda CX-3 has a lower starting price than the Subaru Crosstrek.
