Your Toyota companion for all ownership needs
Guide

Subaru crosstrek vs. outback: battle of the cargo space giants

What To Know

  • The Crosstrek’s estimated fuel economy of 28 mpg in the city and 35 mpg on the highway is slightly better than the Outback’s 26 mpg in the city and 35 mpg on the highway.
  • However, if you value a more compact size, better fuel economy, and a lower price point, the Crosstrek is an excellent alternative.
  • Can I fit a kayak in the Outback with the rear seats down.

When it comes to adventure-ready vehicles, the Subaru Crosstrek and Outback stand out as top contenders. Both models offer impressive cargo capacities, making them perfect for hauling gear, groceries, and everything in between. But which one has the edge when it comes to cargo space? Let’s delve into a comprehensive comparison of the Subaru Crosstrek vs. Outback cargo space.

Cargo Volume: Outback Takes the Lead

Out of the gate, the Subaru Outback emerges as the clear winner in terms of overall cargo volume. With the rear seats folded down, the Outback boasts a cavernous 75.7 cubic feet of cargo space. This generous capacity provides ample room for bulky items, such as camping equipment, furniture, or even a small boat.

Rear Seat Up: Crosstrek’s Compact Advantage

However, when the rear seats are up, the Subaru Crosstrek surprises with its competitive cargo space. Despite its smaller size, the Crosstrek offers an impressive 20.8 cubic feet of cargo capacity. This is slightly more than the Outback’s 20.1 cubic feet, making the Crosstrek the better choice for those who prioritize rear seat space while still having ample cargo room.

Cargo Flexibility: Outback’s Versatile Options

While both vehicles offer versatile cargo configurations, the Outback stands out with its additional features. The Outback’s adjustable cargo floor allows you to customize the height of the floor, creating extra space for taller items. Additionally, the Outback’s power liftgate makes it easy to access the cargo area, especially when your hands are full.

Dimensions and Footprint: Crosstrek’s Compact Maneuverability

The Subaru Crosstrek‘s smaller size translates into better maneuverability in tight spaces. With a length of 176.6 inches and a width of 70.9 inches, the Crosstrek is easier to navigate through narrow streets and crowded parking lots. The Outback, on the other hand, is slightly larger, with a length of 191.3 inches and a width of 73.4 inches.

Fuel Economy: Crosstrek’s Efficiency Edge

While cargo space is a primary consideration, fuel economy is also an important factor. The Subaru Crosstrek has a slight advantage over the Outback in this aspect. The Crosstrek’s estimated fuel economy of 28 mpg in the city and 35 mpg on the highway is slightly better than the Outback’s 26 mpg in the city and 35 mpg on the highway.

Price: Outback’s Premium Value

When it comes to pricing, the Subaru Outback commands a premium over the Crosstrek. The Outback’s starting price is around $27,845, while the Crosstrek starts at a more affordable $23,645. However, the Outback’s additional features, such as the larger cargo space and power liftgate, may justify the price difference for some buyers.

Takeaways: A Tailored Choice

Ultimately, the choice between the Subaru Crosstrek and Outback cargo space depends on your specific needs and priorities. If you prioritize maximum cargo capacity, the Outback is the clear winner. However, if you value a more compact size, better fuel economy, and a lower price point, the Crosstrek is an excellent alternative. Both vehicles excel in their respective areas, making them top contenders in the adventure-ready SUV category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Which vehicle has more cargo space with the rear seats down?
A: Subaru Outback with 75.7 cubic feet.

Q: Which vehicle has a more compact size and better fuel economy?
A: Subaru Crosstrek.

Q: Which vehicle offers a power liftgate and adjustable cargo floor?
A: Subaru Outback.

Q: What is the price difference between the Crosstrek and Outback?
A: The Outback commands a premium of around $4,200 over the Crosstrek.

Q: Which vehicle is better suited for urban environments?
A: Subaru Crosstrek due to its smaller size and better maneuverability.

Q: Which vehicle is better for long road trips with bulky gear?
A: Subaru Outback due to its larger cargo capacity.

Q: Can I fit a bike in the Crosstrek with the rear seats up?
A: Yes, but you may need to remove the front wheel.

Q: Can I fit a kayak in the Outback with the rear seats down?
A: Yes, with the front seats moved forward.

Q: Which vehicle has a higher ground clearance?
A: Both the Crosstrek and Outback have 8.7 inches of ground clearance.

Q: Which vehicle offers a rear-seat entertainment system?
A: Both the Crosstrek and Outback offer rear-seat entertainment options as optional features.

Back to top button