Which suv reigns supreme? subaru forester vs mazda cx-30 head-to-head comparison
What To Know
- The CX-30 with the naturally aspirated engine gets 25 mpg in the city and 33 mpg on the highway, while the turbocharged version returns 22 mpg in the city and 30 mpg on the highway.
- The Forester has slightly more headroom and legroom in the front, while the CX-30 has a bit more legroom in the back.
- The Mazda CX-30 with the naturally aspirated engine has better fuel economy than the Subaru Forester, with 25 mpg in the city and 33 mpg on the highway compared to 26 mpg and 33 mpg, respectively.
In the competitive world of compact SUVs, the Subaru Forester and Mazda CX-30 stand out as two exceptional offerings. Both vehicles boast impressive features, but they also have distinct strengths and weaknesses. This comprehensive comparison will delve into the key aspects of each SUV to help you make an informed decision about which one is right for you.
Performance and Efficiency
Engine and Power:
The Forester comes with a 2.5-liter naturally aspirated engine that produces 182 horsepower and 176 lb-ft of torque. The CX-30 offers two engine options: a 2.5-liter naturally aspirated engine with 186 horsepower and 186 lb-ft of torque, and a 2.5-liter turbocharged engine with 250 horsepower and 320 lb-ft of torque.
Fuel Economy:
The Forester with the base engine achieves an EPA-estimated 26 mpg in the city and 33 mpg on the highway. The CX-30 with the naturally aspirated engine gets 25 mpg in the city and 33 mpg on the highway, while the turbocharged version returns 22 mpg in the city and 30 mpg on the highway.
Handling and Comfort
Driving Dynamics:
The Forester offers a comfortable and well-controlled ride, thanks to its independent suspension and standard all-wheel drive. The CX-30, on the other hand, prioritizes agility and handling, with a more responsive steering and a stiffer suspension.
Cabin Comfort:
Both the Forester and CX-30 have spacious and well-appointed cabins. The Forester’s interior is more rugged and practical, while the CX-30’s is more upscale and stylish.
Safety and Technology
Safety Features:
The Forester and CX-30 both come standard with a comprehensive suite of safety features, including automatic emergency braking, lane departure warning, and adaptive cruise control.
Infotainment System:
The Forester features an 8-inch touchscreen infotainment system with Apple CarPlay and Android Auto compatibility. The CX-30 offers a larger 10.25-inch touchscreen with a more user-friendly interface.
Space and Versatility
Cargo Capacity:
The Forester boasts a generous 31.1 cubic feet of cargo space behind the rear seats, which expands to 76.1 cubic feet with the seats folded down. The CX-30 has a smaller cargo area, with 20.2 cubic feet behind the seats and 45.2 cubic feet with the seats folded.
Passenger Space:
Both the Forester and CX-30 offer comfortable seating for up to five adults. The Forester has slightly more headroom and legroom in the front, while the CX-30 has a bit more legroom in the back.
Price and Value
MSRP:
The 2023 Subaru Forester has a starting MSRP of $28,995, while the 2023 Mazda CX-30 starts at $23,150.
Value Proposition:
The Forester offers a more spacious and practical interior, a more rugged exterior, and a lower starting price. The CX-30, on the other hand, provides a more upscale cabin, better handling, and higher fuel economy (with the naturally aspirated engine).
Which One is Right for You?
The Subaru Forester is an excellent choice for those who prioritize space, versatility, and ruggedness. It’s a great option for families, outdoor enthusiasts, and anyone who needs a vehicle that can handle a variety of conditions.
The Mazda CX-30 is a compelling option for those who value style, handling, and fuel efficiency. It’s a suitable choice for urban commuters, couples, and those who want a compact SUV with a premium feel.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: Which SUV has better fuel economy?
A: The Mazda CX-30 with the naturally aspirated engine has better fuel economy than the Subaru Forester, with 25 mpg in the city and 33 mpg on the highway compared to 26 mpg and 33 mpg, respectively.
Q: Which SUV has more cargo space?
A: The Subaru Forester has significantly more cargo space than the Mazda CX-30, with 31.1 cubic feet behind the rear seats and 76.1 cubic feet with the seats folded down, compared to 20.2 cubic feet and 45.2 cubic feet, respectively.
Q: Which SUV has a better infotainment system?
A: The Mazda CX-30 has a larger and more user-friendly infotainment system than the Subaru Forester, with a 10.25-inch touchscreen and a more intuitive interface.