Unleashing the titans: subaru forester vs nissan x-trail 2010 comparison
What To Know
- The Forester with the naturally aspirated engine gets an EPA-estimated 22 mpg in the city and 29 mpg on the highway, while the X-Trail gets 20 mpg in the city and 27 mpg on the highway.
- The Subaru Forester and the Nissan X-Trail both received high safety ratings from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) and the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS).
- The X-Trail received a 4-star overall safety rating from the NHTSA and a “Good” rating in all IIHS crash tests except for the small overlap front crash test, in which it received an “Acceptable” rating.
When it comes to compact SUVs, the Subaru Forester and the Nissan X-Trail have long been two of the most popular options on the market. Both vehicles offer a spacious interior, versatile cargo space, and impressive off-road capabilities. But which one is the better choice for you? To help you make an informed decision, we’ll compare the 2010 Subaru Forester and the 2010 Nissan X-Trail in terms of their performance, features, safety, and more.
Performance
The Subaru Forester offers two engine options: a 2.5-liter naturally aspirated engine that produces 170 horsepower and 166 lb-ft of torque, and a turbocharged 2.5-liter engine that produces 224 horsepower and 226 lb-ft of torque. The Nissan X-Trail, on the other hand, comes with a single engine option: a 2.5-liter naturally aspirated engine that produces 166 horsepower and 178 lb-ft of torque.
In terms of acceleration, the turbocharged Forester is significantly quicker than the X-Trail, taking just 7.5 seconds to reach 60 mph compared to the X-Trail’s 9.6 seconds. However, the X-Trail has a slightly higher top speed of 115 mph compared to the Forester’s 112 mph.
Fuel Economy
When it comes to fuel economy, the Subaru Forester has a slight edge over the Nissan X-Trail. The Forester with the naturally aspirated engine gets an EPA-estimated 22 mpg in the city and 29 mpg on the highway, while the X-Trail gets 20 mpg in the city and 27 mpg on the highway. The turbocharged Forester gets slightly lower fuel economy, with an EPA-estimated 20 mpg in the city and 27 mpg on the highway.
Interior
The Subaru Forester and the Nissan X-Trail both offer spacious interiors with plenty of room for passengers and cargo. The Forester has a slightly larger interior volume, with 109.1 cubic feet of passenger space compared to the X-Trail’s 105.2 cubic feet. However, the X-Trail has a slightly larger cargo area, with 31.8 cubic feet of space behind the rear seats compared to the Forester’s 29.3 cubic feet.
Both vehicles offer comfortable seats and a variety of amenities, such as air conditioning, power windows, and a CD player. However, the Forester has a few more standard features than the X-Trail, such as a sunroof, heated seats, and a navigation system.
Safety
The Subaru Forester and the Nissan X-Trail both received high safety ratings from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) and the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS). The Forester received a 5-star overall safety rating from the NHTSA and a “Good” rating in all IIHS crash tests. The X-Trail received a 4-star overall safety rating from the NHTSA and a “Good” rating in all IIHS crash tests except for the small overlap front crash test, in which it received an “Acceptable” rating.
Both vehicles come standard with a variety of safety features, such as airbags, anti-lock brakes, and electronic stability control. However, the Forester offers a few more standard safety features than the X-Trail, such as blind spot monitoring and lane departure warning.
Off-Road Capabilities
The Subaru Forester and the Nissan X-Trail are both capable off-road vehicles. However, the Forester has a slight edge over the X-Trail in terms of ground clearance and approach and departure angles. The Forester has a ground clearance of 8.7 inches, compared to the X-Trail’s 8.1 inches. The Forester also has a slightly better approach angle of 25.2 degrees compared to the X-Trail’s 24.4 degrees, and a slightly better departure angle of 25.8 degrees compared to the X-Trail’s 24.7 degrees.
Price
The Subaru Forester and the Nissan X-Trail are both priced similarly. The 2010 Subaru Forester has a starting price of $22,995, while the 2010 Nissan X-Trail has a starting price of $22,970. However, the Forester offers more standard features than the X-Trail, so it may be a better value for your money.
Which One is Right for You?
The Subaru Forester and the Nissan X-Trail are both excellent choices for compact SUV buyers. The Forester offers more standard features, better fuel economy, and slightly better off-road capabilities than the X-Trail. However, the X-Trail has a slightly larger cargo area and a lower starting price. Ultimately, the best choice for you depends on your individual needs and preferences.
Final Thoughts
Whether you choose the Subaru Forester or the Nissan X-Trail, you’ll be getting a great compact SUV that is perfect for everyday driving and occasional off-road adventures. Both vehicles offer a spacious interior, versatile cargo space, and impressive safety features. So, take your time, test drive both vehicles, and decide which one is the best fit for you.
Questions We Hear a Lot
Which vehicle has a more powerful engine?
The Subaru Forester with the turbocharged engine has a more powerful engine than the Nissan X-Trail.
Which vehicle has better fuel economy?
The Subaru Forester with the naturally aspirated engine has better fuel economy than the Nissan X-Trail.
Which vehicle has a larger cargo area?
The Nissan X-Trail has a slightly larger cargo area than the Subaru Forester.
Which vehicle has a higher safety rating?
The Subaru Forester has a slightly higher safety rating than the Nissan X-Trail.
Which vehicle has better off-road capabilities?
The Subaru Forester has slightly better off-road capabilities than the Nissan X-Trail.