Suzuki Gixxer Sf 150 Vs Pulsar Ns 160

The Suzuki Gixxer SF 150 and Pulsar NS 160 are two of the most popular streetfighters in India. Both bikes offer a potent blend of performance, style, and affordability. But which one is the better choice for you? In this comprehensive comparison, we’ll pit the Suzuki Gixxer SF 150 against the Pulsar NS 160 to determine which bike reigns supreme.

Engine and Performance

Suzuki Gixxer SF 150

• Single-cylinder, air-cooled, 155cc engine
• 14.1 PS of power at 8,000 rpm
• 14 Nm of torque at 6,000 rpm

Pulsar NS 160

• Single-cylinder, air-cooled, 160.3cc engine
• 17.2 PS of power at 9,000 rpm
• 14.6 Nm of torque at 7,250 rpm

The Pulsar NS 160 has a slight advantage in terms of power and torque, but both bikes offer ample performance for city commuting and occasional highway runs.

Design and Styling

Suzuki Gixxer SF 150

• Sharp and sporty design
• Split-style headlamp
• Muscular fuel tank
• Split seat with a pillion grab rail

Pulsar NS 160

• Aggressive and muscular design
• Projector headlamp
• Sculpted fuel tank
• Single-piece seat

Both bikes have their unique design elements, but the Pulsar NS 160’s aggressive styling gives it a more imposing presence.

Features

Suzuki Gixxer SF 150

• Digital instrument cluster
• Single-channel ABS
• LED headlamp

Pulsar NS 160

• Semi-digital instrument cluster
• Single-channel ABS
• LED taillamp

The Pulsar NS 160 offers a slightly more comprehensive feature list, including a semi-digital instrument cluster and an LED taillamp.

Handling and Ride Quality

Suzuki Gixxer SF 150

• Rigid frame
• Telescopic front forks
• Monoshock rear suspension

Pulsar NS 160

• Perimeter frame
• Telescopic front forks
• Nitrox mono-shock rear suspension

The Suzuki Gixxer SF 150 has a slightly stiffer suspension setup, providing better handling at higher speeds. However, the Pulsar NS 160’s Nitrox mono-shock rear suspension offers a more comfortable ride quality.

Fuel Efficiency

Suzuki Gixxer SF 150

• Around 50-55 kmpl in city riding
• Around 60-65 kmpl on the highway

Pulsar NS 160

• Around 45-50 kmpl in city riding
• Around 55-60 kmpl on the highway

The Suzuki Gixxer SF 150 has a slight advantage in terms of fuel efficiency, making it a more economical choice for daily commuting.

Price and Availability

Suzuki Gixxer SF 150

• Starting from around Rs. 1.15 lakh (ex-showroom)

Pulsar NS 160

• Starting from around Rs. 1.25 lakh (ex-showroom)

The Pulsar NS 160 is slightly more expensive than the Suzuki Gixxer SF 150, but it offers a more comprehensive feature list and a more powerful engine.

The Verdict: Which Bike is Right for You?

Both the Suzuki Gixxer SF 150 and Pulsar NS 160 are excellent streetfighters that offer a potent blend of performance, style, and affordability. However, the choice between the two ultimately depends on your individual preferences and requirements.

If you prioritize performance, aggressive styling, and a more comprehensive feature list, the Pulsar NS 160 is the better choice.

If you prioritize fuel efficiency, a more comfortable ride quality, and a slightly lower price, the Suzuki Gixxer SF 150 is the better choice.

Common Questions and Answers

Q1: Which bike is more powerful?
A: The Pulsar NS 160 is slightly more powerful, with 17.2 PS of power compared to the Gixxer SF 150’s 14.1 PS.

Q2: Which bike is more fuel-efficient?
A: The Suzuki Gixxer SF 150 is slightly more fuel-efficient, with an average of 50-55 kmpl in city riding compared to the Pulsar NS 160’s 45-50 kmpl.

Q3: Which bike has better handling?
A: The Suzuki Gixxer SF 150 has slightly better handling at higher speeds due to its stiffer suspension setup.

Q4: Which bike has a more comfortable ride quality?
A: The Pulsar NS 160 has a more comfortable ride quality due to its Nitrox mono-shock rear suspension.

Q5: Which bike is more affordable?
A: The Suzuki Gixxer SF 150 is slightly more affordable, starting from around Rs. 1.15 lakh (ex-showroom) compared to the Pulsar NS 160’s starting price of around Rs. 1.25 lakh (ex-showroom).