The battle of the suvs: toyota 4runner vs mazda cx-50, which reigns supreme?

When it comes to rugged off-roading capabilities, two names immediately spring to mind: the Toyota 4Runner and the Mazda CX-50. Both these SUVs command respect in the adventure community, but which one reigns supreme? In this epic showdown, we dissect the Toyota 4Runner vs. Mazda CX-50 to determine their strengths, weaknesses, and which one is the ultimate off-road conqueror.

Off-Road Prowess: A Comparison of Capabilities

4WD Systems and Ground Clearance

The Toyota 4Runner boasts a legendary 4WD system that has proven its mettle in countless off-road expeditions. Its three modes (2WD, 4WD High, and 4WD Low) provide unparalleled versatility for tackling various terrains. The Mazda CX-50, on the other hand, features an advanced i-Activ AWD system that distributes power intelligently to all four wheels, enhancing traction and control. However, the 4Runner’s superior ground clearance of 9.6 inches gives it an edge in navigating rocky or uneven surfaces.

Suspension and Traction Control

Both the 4Runner and CX-50 are equipped with robust suspension systems designed to handle the rigors of off-roading. The 4Runner’s Kinetic Dynamic Suspension System (KDSS) actively adjusts the sway bars to maximize articulation and maintain stability. The CX-50 counters with its G-Vectoring Control Plus system, which enhances cornering stability and traction on slippery surfaces.

Approach and Departure Angles

When it comes to tackling steep inclines and descents, approach and departure angles are crucial. The 4Runner’s impressive approach and departure angles of 33 and 26 degrees, respectively, allow it to conquer obstacles with confidence. While the CX-50’s angles are slightly less (28 and 24 degrees), it still performs admirably in most off-road situations.

On-Road Performance: A Balance of Comfort and Agility

Powertrains and Performance

The 4Runner offers a choice of two powertrains: a 4.0-liter V6 producing 270 horsepower and a 2.7-liter inline-four turbocharged engine with 239 horsepower. The CX-50, in contrast, comes with a single 2.5-liter inline-four turbocharged engine that generates 256 horsepower. Both SUVs provide ample power for everyday driving and light off-roading, but the 4Runner’s V6 engine offers a more robust low-end torque for heavy-duty tasks.

Handling and Steering

The 4Runner’s rugged body-on-frame construction provides excellent stability and durability, but it can feel less nimble than the CX-50 on paved roads. The CX-50’s unibody design and responsive steering offer a more car-like driving experience, making it more enjoyable for on-road maneuvers.

Fuel Economy and Emissions

Fuel efficiency is an important consideration for adventure enthusiasts who venture far from civilization. The 4Runner’s V6 engine has an EPA-estimated fuel economy of 17 mpg city/20 mpg highway, while the turbocharged inline-four engine improves to 20 mpg city/23 mpg highway. The CX-50’s turbocharged engine delivers an impressive 24 mpg city/28 mpg highway, making it the more fuel-efficient choice.

Interior Design and Features: Comfort Meets Adventure

Cabin Space and Seating

The 4Runner’s spacious interior offers ample room for five passengers and their gear. The front seats provide excellent support and visibility, while the rear seats offer generous legroom and headroom. The CX-50, on the other hand, has a slightly more compact cabin, but it still provides comfortable seating for four or five adults.

Technology and Connectivity

Both the 4Runner and CX-50 come equipped with modern infotainment systems. The 4Runner’s 8-inch touchscreen display features Apple CarPlay and Android Auto compatibility, while the CX-50’s 10.25-inch touchscreen offers a more intuitive interface with a wider range of features.

Off-Road Features

The 4Runner’s dashboard includes a dedicated off-road mode selector that provides real-time information on terrain conditions and vehicle performance. The CX-50 lacks such a dedicated off-road system, but it does offer a variety of driver-assistance features that can enhance safety and control in challenging conditions.

Pricing and Value: Assessing the Investment

Manufacturer’s Suggested Retail Price (MSRP)

The 4Runner’s MSRP ranges from $38,340 for the base SR5 trim to $56,890 for the top-of-the-line TRD Pro trim. The CX-50’s MSRP starts at $28,025 for the base 2.5 S trim and goes up to $41,950 for the Turbo Premium Plus trim.

Resale Value and Reliability

The 4Runner has a strong reputation for reliability and resale value. It consistently ranks among the top-rated SUVs in terms of durability and longevity. The CX-50 is a newer model, so it does not have as much established data on its reliability or resale value.

Warranty and Maintenance

Both the 4Runner and CX-50 come with a comprehensive warranty package that includes a 3-year/36,000-mile basic warranty and a 5-year/60,000-mile powertrain warranty. The 4Runner’s scheduled maintenance costs are typically slightly higher than the CX-50’s, but this is partly due to its more frequent oil change intervals.

Key Points: The Verdict on the Ultimate Off-Road Champion

In the epic battle of the Toyota 4Runner vs. Mazda CX-50, both SUVs prove to be formidable off-road contenders. The 4Runner’s legendary 4WD system, superior ground clearance, and rugged body-on-frame construction give it an edge in tackling extreme terrain. However, the CX-50’s more fuel-efficient engine, car-like handling, and advanced safety features make it a compelling choice for those who prioritize on-road comfort and versatility. Ultimately, the decision between the two depends on individual needs and preferences. For those seeking an unstoppable off-road beast, the Toyota 4Runner remains the undisputed champion. For those seeking a balance of off-road capability, on-road comfort, and fuel efficiency, the Mazda CX-50 emerges as a worthy challenger.

Quick Answers to Your FAQs

Q: Which SUV has better off-road capabilities, the 4Runner or CX-50?
A: The 4Runner has a more robust 4WD system, higher ground clearance, and proven off-road heritage, making it the more capable off-roader.

Q: Which SUV is more fuel-efficient?
A: The CX-50 has a more fuel-efficient engine than the 4Runner, delivering up to 28 mpg highway compared to the 4Runner’s 23 mpg.

Q: Which SUV has a more spacious interior?
A: The 4Runner has a more spacious cabin with more legroom and headroom for passengers and cargo.

Q: Which SUV has a better infotainment system?
A: The CX-50 has a more modern and intuitive infotainment system with a larger touchscreen display and more features.

Q: Which SUV has a higher resale value?
A: The 4Runner has a stronger reputation for reliability and resale value, making it a better long-term investment.