Toyota Highlander Vs. Mazda Cx-90: Which One Is The Better Choice For Families And Adventure Enthusiasts?

In the realm of three-row SUVs, the Toyota Highlander and the Mazda CX-90 stand as prominent players, each promising a blend of versatility, comfort, and performance. As you navigate the decision-making process, weighing the strengths and weaknesses of these formidable rivals becomes paramount. This comprehensive comparison delves into the intricacies of the Toyota Highlander vs Mazda CX-90 matchup, providing discerning insights to guide your choice.

Performance Prowess: Powertrains and Efficiency

At the heart of the Toyota Highlander lies a robust 3.5-liter V6 engine, churning out a respectable 295 horsepower and 263 lb-ft of torque. Paired with an eight-speed automatic transmission, this powertrain delivers a composed and confident driving experience, whether navigating urban streets or embarking on long road trips.

The Mazda CX-90, on the other hand, boasts a turbocharged 3.3-liter inline-six engine, generating an impressive 340 horsepower and 369 lb-ft of torque. Coupled with a six-speed automatic transmission, this engine offers a thrilling driving experience, characterized by responsive acceleration and a refined power delivery.

In terms of fuel efficiency, the Toyota Highlander holds a slight edge, achieving an EPA-estimated 21 mpg in the city and 29 mpg on the highway. The Mazda CX-90, while delivering exhilarating performance, returns a slightly lower EPA-estimated 18 mpg in the city and 24 mpg on the highway.

Interior Comforts and Versatility

Stepping inside the Toyota Highlander reveals a spacious and well-appointed cabin, featuring comfortable seating for up to eight passengers. The interior exudes a sense of refinement, with soft-touch materials and intuitive controls. The second-row seats offer ample legroom and headroom, while the third row, though somewhat tight, can accommodate adults for short journeys.

The Mazda CX-90’s cabin is equally impressive, showcasing a modern and sophisticated design. The use of premium materials and thoughtful craftsmanship creates an inviting and luxurious atmosphere. The second-row seats provide generous space, and the third row, while not as spacious as the Highlander’s, offers decent legroom and headroom.

Both SUVs offer a plethora of cargo space, making them ideal for families and outdoor enthusiasts. With the third row folded down, the Toyota Highlander provides 48.4 cubic feet of cargo capacity, while the Mazda CX-90 offers a slightly larger 51.6 cubic feet.

Safety and Driver Assistance Features

The Toyota Highlander and Mazda CX-90 prioritize safety, equipping their vehicles with an array of advanced driver assistance systems. Both SUVs come standard with features such as automatic emergency braking, lane departure warning, and adaptive cruise control.

The Toyota Highlander further enhances safety with a blind-spot monitoring system, rear cross-traffic alert, and a panoramic view monitor. The Mazda CX-90, in addition to these features, offers a head-up display, a surround-view camera system, and a driver attention monitoring system.

Technology and Infotainment

The Toyota Highlander features an 8-inch touchscreen infotainment system, compatible with Apple CarPlay and Android Auto. The system is user-friendly and intuitive, with clear graphics and responsive controls. The Mazda CX-90 boasts a larger 12.3-inch touchscreen display, also compatible with Apple CarPlay and Android Auto. The system features a sleek and modern interface, with customizable widgets and a rotary controller for added convenience.

Off-Road Prowess: All-Wheel Drive Systems

The Toyota Highlander offers an available all-wheel drive system, enhancing traction and stability in challenging weather conditions. The system automatically distributes power between the front and rear wheels, ensuring optimal grip on various surfaces.

The Mazda CX-90 also features an all-wheel drive system, which actively monitors road conditions and distributes power accordingly. The system enhances off-road capabilities, enabling the SUV to tackle rough terrain with confidence.

Which SUV Reigns Supreme?

The Toyota Highlander and Mazda CX-90 are both exceptional three-row SUVs, offering a compelling blend of performance, comfort, and versatility. The Highlander impresses with its fuel efficiency, spacious interior, and comprehensive safety features. The CX-90 counters with exhilarating performance, a luxurious cabin, and advanced technology.

Ultimately, the choice between these two SUVs depends on your individual preferences and priorities. If fuel efficiency and a spacious interior are paramount, the Toyota Highlander emerges as the ideal choice. However, if you seek exhilarating performance, a luxurious cabin, and cutting-edge technology, the Mazda CX-90 stands as the superior option.

Beyond the Comparison: Additional Considerations

Apart from the direct comparison, there are additional factors to ponder when making your decision. Consider your budget, as the Mazda CX-90 carries a higher starting price than the Toyota Highlander. Moreover, evaluate your lifestyle and driving needs. If you frequently venture off the beaten path, the Highlander’s slightly better off-road capabilities might sway your decision.

Top Questions Asked

Q: Which SUV offers a more comfortable ride?

A: Both the Toyota Highlander and Mazda CX-90 provide comfortable rides, with well-cushioned seats and composed handling. However, the CX-90’s slightly softer suspension might offer a marginally more comfortable ride over rough roads.

Q: Is the Mazda CX-90’s infotainment system worth the upgrade?

A: The Mazda CX-90’s 12.3-inch touchscreen display is larger and features a more modern interface compared to the Toyota Highlander‘s 8-inch unit. However, the Highlander’s system is still user-friendly and functional. The decision ultimately depends on your preference for a larger display and more advanced features.

Q: How does the cargo space compare between the two SUVs?

A: With the third row folded down, the Mazda CX-90 offers slightly more cargo space than the Toyota Highlander, at 51.6 cubic feet compared to 48.4 cubic feet. However, both SUVs provide ample cargo capacity for families and outdoor enthusiasts.