Your Toyota companion for all ownership needs
Guide

4 Vs Cherokee: The Ultimate Showdown Of Off-road Beasts!

What To Know

  • 0-liter turbocharged four-cylinder engine gets an EPA-estimated 23 mpg in the city and 31 mpg on the highway, while the V6 engine gets an EPA-estimated 20 mpg in the city and 27 mpg on the highway.
  • Both vehicles received a five-star overall safety rating from the NHTSA, and the RAV4 earned a Top Safety Pick+ award from the IIHS, while the Cherokee Latitude earned a Top Safety Pick award.
  • The Toyota RAV4 and Jeep Cherokee Latitude offer similar pricing, with the RAV4 starting at $26,500 and the Cherokee Latitude starting at $27,490.

The Toyota RAV4 and Jeep Cherokee Latitude are two of the most popular compact SUVs on the market. Both vehicles offer a variety of features and capabilities that make them ideal for families and outdoor enthusiasts alike. But which one is the better choice? In this comprehensive comparison, we’ll pit the Toyota RAV4 against the Jeep Cherokee Latitude to determine which SUV reigns supreme. Read on to discover which vehicle offers the best performance, features, fuel efficiency, and value for your money.

Performance: Power and Handling Compared

The Toyota RAV4 and Jeep Cherokee Latitude offer different powertrain options, each with its own unique characteristics. The RAV4 comes standard with a 2.5-liter four-cylinder engine that produces 203 horsepower and 184 lb-ft of torque. The Cherokee Latitude, on the other hand, offers two engine options: a 2.0-liter turbocharged four-cylinder engine that generates 270 horsepower and 295 lb-ft of torque, and a 3.2-liter V6 engine that produces 271 horsepower and 239 lb-ft of torque.

In terms of handling, the RAV4 offers a comfortable and composed ride, while the Cherokee Latitude provides a more rugged and adventurous driving experience. The RAV4’s suspension absorbs bumps and road imperfections well, making it a great choice for daily commutes and long road trips. The Cherokee Latitude’s suspension is stiffer, which provides better control on off-road trails but can make for a rougher ride on paved roads.

Features: Comparing Comfort and Convenience

The Toyota RAV4 and Jeep Cherokee Latitude offer a wide range of features and amenities to enhance comfort and convenience. The RAV4 comes standard with features such as a 7-inch touchscreen display, Apple CarPlay and Android Auto compatibility, a rearview camera, and a suite of safety features, including lane departure alert and automatic emergency braking. The Cherokee Latitude offers similar features, including an 8.4-inch touchscreen display, Apple CarPlay and Android Auto compatibility, a rearview camera, and a variety of safety features, such as blind-spot monitoring and rear cross-traffic alert.

In terms of cargo space, the RAV4 offers 37.6 cubic feet of cargo space behind the rear seats and 69.8 cubic feet with the rear seats folded down. The Cherokee Latitude offers slightly more cargo space, with 38.7 cubic feet behind the rear seats and 72.4 cubic feet with the rear seats folded down.

Fuel Efficiency: Miles per Gallon Compared

The Toyota RAV4 and Jeep Cherokee Latitude offer different fuel economy ratings depending on the engine option chosen. The RAV4 with the 2.5-liter four-cylinder engine gets an EPA-estimated 28 mpg in the city and 35 mpg on the highway. The Cherokee Latitude with the 2.0-liter turbocharged four-cylinder engine gets an EPA-estimated 23 mpg in the city and 31 mpg on the highway, while the V6 engine gets an EPA-estimated 20 mpg in the city and 27 mpg on the highway.

Safety: Comparing Crash Test Ratings and Features

The Toyota RAV4 and Jeep Cherokee Latitude have both earned high safety ratings from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) and the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS). Both vehicles received a five-star overall safety rating from the NHTSA, and the RAV4 earned a Top Safety Pick+ award from the IIHS, while the Cherokee Latitude earned a Top Safety Pick award.

In terms of safety features, both vehicles come standard with a variety of features, including airbags, anti-lock brakes, and electronic stability control. The RAV4 offers additional safety features, such as lane departure alert and automatic emergency braking, while the Cherokee Latitude offers features such as blind-spot monitoring and rear cross-traffic alert.

Value: Comparing Price and Ownership Costs

The Toyota RAV4 and Jeep Cherokee Latitude offer similar pricing, with the RAV4 starting at $26,500 and the Cherokee Latitude starting at $27,490. However, the RAV4 offers better value for money, as it comes standard with more features than the Cherokee Latitude. Additionally, the RAV4 has lower ownership costs, with an estimated five-year cost of ownership of $31,500 compared to the Cherokee Latitude’s estimated five-year cost of ownership of $34,000.

The Verdict: Choosing the Right SUV for Your Needs

The Toyota RAV4 and Jeep Cherokee Latitude are both excellent compact SUVs that offer a variety of features and capabilities. However, the RAV4 offers a better overall value, with more standard features, better fuel efficiency, and lower ownership costs. The Cherokee Latitude, on the other hand, offers a more rugged and adventurous driving experience, as well as slightly more cargo space. Ultimately, the best choice for you will depend on your individual needs and preferences.

Common Questions and Answers

Q: Which SUV has better off-road capabilities?

A: The Jeep Cherokee Latitude has better off-road capabilities than the Toyota RAV4, thanks to its four-wheel drive system and rugged suspension.

Q: Which SUV has more cargo space?

A: The Jeep Cherokee Latitude has slightly more cargo space than the Toyota RAV4, with 38.7 cubic feet behind the rear seats and 72.4 cubic feet with the rear seats folded down.

Q: Which SUV is more fuel-efficient?

A: The Toyota RAV4 is more fuel-efficient than the Jeep Cherokee Latitude, with an EPA-estimated 28 mpg in the city and 35 mpg on the highway compared to the Cherokee Latitude’s 23 mpg in the city and 31 mpg on the highway.

Was this page helpful?
Back to top button