Which Toyota Conquers The Great Outdoors: Tundra Vs 4runner Revealed!
What To Know
- The Tundra can tow up to 10,200 pounds and carry a payload of up to 1,730 pounds, while the 4Runner can only tow up to 5,000 pounds and carry a payload of up to 1,440 pounds.
- The 4Runner gets up to 20 mpg in the city and 27 mpg on the highway, while the Tundra only gets up to 18 mpg in the city and 24 mpg on the highway.
- The Toyota 4Runner has a better fuel economy, getting up to 20 mpg in the city and 27 mpg on the highway compared to the Tundra’s 18 mpg in the city and 24 mpg on the highway.
The Toyota Tundra and 4Runner are two of the most popular vehicles in their respective segments. The Tundra is a full-size pickup truck that offers plenty of power and towing capacity, while the 4Runner is a mid-size SUV that is known for its off-road prowess. Both vehicles have their own strengths and weaknesses, so it’s important to compare them carefully before making a decision.
Towing and Payload Capacity
The Tundra has a clear advantage over the 4Runner in terms of towing and payload capacity. The Tundra can tow up to 10,200 pounds and carry a payload of up to 1,730 pounds, while the 4Runner can only tow up to 5,000 pounds and carry a payload of up to 1,440 pounds. If you need a vehicle that can handle heavy loads, the Tundra is the better choice.
Off-Road Capability
The 4Runner is the clear winner in terms of off-road capability. It has a higher ground clearance, a shorter wheelbase, and a more sophisticated four-wheel-drive system than the Tundra. The 4Runner also has a locking rear differential, which gives it even more traction in slippery conditions. If you plan on doing any serious off-roading, the 4Runner is the better choice.
Interior Space and Comfort
The Tundra has a more spacious interior than the 4Runner, with more headroom, legroom, and shoulder room. The Tundra also has a larger cargo area, with 58.3 cubic feet of space behind the second row of seats compared to 47.2 cubic feet in the 4Runner. If you need a vehicle with plenty of space for passengers and cargo, the Tundra is the better choice.
Fuel Economy
The 4Runner has a better fuel economy than the Tundra. The 4Runner gets up to 20 mpg in the city and 27 mpg on the highway, while the Tundra only gets up to 18 mpg in the city and 24 mpg on the highway. If you’re looking for a vehicle that is more fuel-efficient, the 4Runner is the better choice.
Price
The Tundra is more expensive than the 4Runner. The base price of the Tundra is $34,550, while the base price of the 4Runner is $36,340. However, the Tundra offers more features and a more powerful engine than the 4Runner, so it’s worth considering the price difference before making a decision.
Which Vehicle is Right for You?
The Toyota Tundra and 4Runner are both excellent vehicles, but they offer different things. The Tundra is a better choice for those who need a vehicle with plenty of power, towing capacity, and payload capacity. The 4Runner is a better choice for those who need a vehicle with excellent off-road capability, fuel economy, and interior space.
The Verdict: Toyota Tundra vs Toyota 4Runner
The Toyota Tundra and 4Runner are both excellent vehicles, but they offer different things. The Tundra is a better choice for those who need a vehicle with plenty of power, towing capacity, and payload capacity. The 4Runner is a better choice for those who need a vehicle with excellent off-road capability, fuel economy, and interior space.
Top Questions Asked
Q: Which vehicle has a higher towing capacity?
A: The Toyota Tundra has a higher towing capacity of 10,200 pounds compared to the Toyota 4Runner’s 5,000 pounds.
Q: Which vehicle has a better fuel economy?
A: The Toyota 4Runner has a better fuel economy, getting up to 20 mpg in the city and 27 mpg on the highway compared to the Tundra’s 18 mpg in the city and 24 mpg on the highway.
Q: Which vehicle has a more spacious interior?
A: The Toyota Tundra has a more spacious interior, with more headroom, legroom, and shoulder room, as well as a larger cargo area with 58.3 cubic feet of space compared to the 4Runner’s 47.2 cubic feet.