Triumph tiger 800 vs yamaha tenere 700: the battle of the off-road giants
What To Know
- The Tiger 800 features a well-balanced chassis and a sophisticated suspension system that provides excellent handling and stability on challenging terrain.
- The Tenere 700, on the other hand, provides excellent value for money, offering a capable adventure bike at a more affordable price.
- The Triumph Tiger 800 offers a more comfortable riding position, a larger fuel tank, and a wider range of features for long-distance touring.
In the realm of adventure motorcycles, two formidable contenders stand out: the Triumph Tiger 800 and the Yamaha Tenere 700. Both bikes offer a tantalizing blend of off-road capability, touring comfort, and on-road performance. But which one reigns supreme? In this comprehensive comparison, we delve into the intricacies of these two adventure behemoths to help you make an informed decision.
Engine and Performance
The Triumph Tiger 800 boasts a potent 800cc triple-cylinder engine that delivers a thrilling combination of power and torque. Its smooth and responsive nature makes it a pleasure to ride on both tarmac and trails. On the other hand, the Yamaha Tenere 700 packs a 689cc parallel-twin engine that is renowned for its reliability and fuel efficiency. While it may not offer the same level of power as the Tiger, it provides ample grunt for most adventure riding scenarios.
Handling and Suspension
Off-road agility is paramount in an adventure bike, and both the Tiger 800 and Tenere 700 deliver. The Tiger 800 features a well-balanced chassis and a sophisticated suspension system that provides excellent handling and stability on challenging terrain. The Tenere 700, known for its nimble nature, shines in tight trails and technical sections. Its long-travel suspension absorbs bumps and obstacles with ease, making it a formidable off-road performer.
Comfort and Ergonomics
Comfort plays a crucial role in long-distance adventure rides. The Tiger 800 offers an upright riding position and a plush seat that provides ample support. Its adjustable windscreen and handlebars allow riders to tailor the ergonomics to their liking. The Tenere 700 also offers a comfortable riding position, with a seat that is slightly narrower than the Tiger’s. Its lower seat height makes it more accessible for shorter riders.
Technology and Features
Modern adventure bikes come equipped with a host of electronic aids and features. The Tiger 800 boasts a comprehensive suite of rider aids, including traction control, ABS, cruise control, and multiple riding modes. The Tenere 700, while not as feature-rich as the Tiger, offers essential features such as ABS, traction control, and a simple instrument cluster.
Pricing and Value
The Triumph Tiger 800 typically commands a higher price point than the Yamaha Tenere 700. However, it offers a wider range of features and a more powerful engine. The Tenere 700, on the other hand, provides excellent value for money, offering a capable adventure bike at a more affordable price.
In a nutshell: The Verdict
The choice between the Triumph Tiger 800 and Yamaha Tenere 700 ultimately depends on your individual preferences and riding style. If you prioritize power, comfort, and technology, the Tiger 800 is an excellent choice. However, if affordability, off-road agility, and simplicity are your top priorities, the Tenere 700 is a compelling contender. Regardless of your choice, both bikes offer an exhilarating and versatile adventure riding experience.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: Which bike is better for long-distance touring?
A: The Triumph Tiger 800 offers a more comfortable riding position, a larger fuel tank, and a wider range of features for long-distance touring.
Q: Which bike is more fuel-efficient?
A: The Yamaha Tenere 700 is generally more fuel-efficient than the Triumph Tiger 800, thanks to its smaller engine and lighter weight.
Q: Which bike is easier to maintain?
A: The Yamaha Tenere 700 is generally considered to be easier to maintain than the Triumph Tiger 800, due to its simpler design and fewer electronic components.