Yamaha Rayzr 125 Fi Hybrid Vs Suzuki Access 125
What To Know
- The Suzuki Access 125, on the other hand, adopts a more traditional scooter design with a spacious floorboard and a plush seat.
- Both the Yamaha RayZR 125 FI Hybrid and Suzuki Access 125 have similar top speeds, with the RayZR 125 FI Hybrid slightly edging out the Access 125 due to its hybrid assist.
- The Suzuki Access 125 has a slightly larger fuel tank than the Yamaha RayZR 125 FI Hybrid, with a capacity of 5.
The world of scooters has witnessed a surge in the demand for fuel-efficient and eco-friendly options. Amidst this competitive landscape, the Yamaha RayZR 125 FI Hybrid and Suzuki Access 125 stand out as formidable rivals. Both scooters boast impressive features and technologies, making them worthy contenders in the 125cc hybrid scooter segment. In this comprehensive comparison, we will delve into the key aspects of these scooters, providing an in-depth analysis to help you make an informed decision.
Performance and Mileage
The Yamaha RayZR 125 FI Hybrid employs a 125cc, air-cooled, fuel-injected engine with a smart motor generator (SMG) system. This hybrid technology seamlessly assists the engine during acceleration, resulting in improved fuel efficiency and reduced emissions. In contrast, the Suzuki Access 125 features a 124cc, air-cooled, carburetor-equipped engine. While it lacks hybrid technology, it delivers a commendable balance of performance and fuel economy.
In terms of mileage, the Yamaha RayZR 125 FI Hybrid shines with an ARAI-certified mileage of 66 km/l. The Suzuki Access 125, on the other hand, offers a slightly lower but still impressive mileage of 64 km/l.
Features and Technology
The Yamaha RayZR 125 FI Hybrid comes loaded with an array of advanced features. It boasts a fully digital instrument cluster, a USB charging port, a smart key system, and a disc brake at the front. The Suzuki Access 125, while not as feature-rich, offers a practical and functional package. It includes an analog instrument panel, a DC socket for charging, a central locking system, and a front disc brake.
Design and Comfort
The Yamaha RayZR 125 FI Hybrid sports a sleek and sporty design with sharp lines and aerodynamic curves. Its comfortable seat and upright riding position provide a relaxed riding experience. The Suzuki Access 125, on the other hand, adopts a more traditional scooter design with a spacious floorboard and a plush seat.
Price and Availability
The Yamaha RayZR 125 FI Hybrid is priced slightly higher than the Suzuki Access 125. However, its premium features and hybrid technology justify the cost difference. Both scooters are widely available at authorized dealerships across the country.
Which Scooter Should You Choose?
The choice between the Yamaha RayZR 125 FI Hybrid and the Suzuki Access 125 ultimately depends on your specific requirements and preferences. If fuel efficiency, advanced features, and a sporty design are high on your priority list, the Yamaha RayZR 125 FI Hybrid is an excellent option. However, if you seek a practical and budget-friendly scooter with a proven track record, the Suzuki Access 125 is a reliable choice.
In a nutshell: The Verdict
The Yamaha RayZR 125 FI Hybrid and Suzuki Access 125 are both exceptional scooters in their own right. The RayZR 125 FI Hybrid stands out with its hybrid technology, impressive mileage, and premium features. Meanwhile, the Access 125 offers a solid combination of practicality, reliability, and affordability. Whether you value innovation or simplicity, there’s a scooter here that will meet your needs.
Questions You May Have
Q1. Which scooter has a higher top speed?
Both the Yamaha RayZR 125 FI Hybrid and Suzuki Access 125 have similar top speeds, with the RayZR 125 FI Hybrid slightly edging out the Access 125 due to its hybrid assist.
Q2. Does the Suzuki Access 125 have a USB charging port?
No, the Suzuki Access 125 does not have a USB charging port.
Q3. Which scooter has a larger fuel tank?
The Suzuki Access 125 has a slightly larger fuel tank than the Yamaha RayZR 125 FI Hybrid, with a capacity of 5.6 liters compared to 5.2 liters.